NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: WLD Practice Holdings Pty Ltd, in respect of the WLD Practice Holdings Trust v Sara Stockham and Anor [2020] NSWSC 395 Hearing dates: 3 April 2020 Decision date: 15 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Sackar J Decision: See paras [67], [74] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Stay of proceedings — Whether dispute resolution clause precludes judicial advice — public policy considerations
EQUITY — Trusts and trustees — Judicial advice — Whether questions appropriate for judicial advice Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) Cases Cited: Advanced National Services Pty Ltd v Daintree Contractors Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 270 Akai Pty Ltd v People's Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418 Andrew v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205 BHPB Freight Pty Ltd v Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd (2008) 168 FCR 169 Black v Norris (1990) 20 NSWLR 300 Brighton Australia Pty Ltd v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (2018) 56 VR 557 112 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304 Comandate Marine Corp v Pan Australian Shipping Pty Ltd (2006) 157 FCR 45 Dance With Mr D Limited v Dirty Dancing Investments Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 332 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd [2017] HCA 12 Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd (No 1) (1988) 79 ALR 83 Huddart Parker Ltd v Ship Mill Hill (1950) 81 CLR 502 Incitec Limited v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496 International Ait Transport Association v Ansett Australia Holdings Ltd (2008) 234 CLR 151 J & H Manktelow Pty Ltd v Alloway Grazing Pty Ltd (1975) 1 NSWLR 385 Leerac Pty Ltd v Garrick E Fay [2008] NSWSC 1082 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated v His Eminence Petar the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Church of Australia and New Zealand (2008) 237 CLR 66 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Limited v Wright Prospecting Pty Limited (S99/2015; S102/2015) (2015) 256 CLR 104 Network Ten Pty Ltd v TX Australia Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 312 O'Grady v Northern Queensland Co Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 356 Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Co Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 Qantas Airways v Dillingham Corporation (1985) 4 NSWLR 113 Re Estate Late Chow Cho-Poon (2013) 10 ASTLR 251; [2013] NSWSC 844 Rinehart v Welker (2012) 95 NSWLR 221 United Group Rail Services v Rail Corporation (2009) 74 NSWLR 618 Upper Hunter CDC v Australian Chilling and Freezing (1968) 118 CLR 429 Westfield Management Ltd v AMP Capital Property Nominees Ltd 247 CLR 129 Texts Cited: Mustill and Boyd on Commercial Arbitration in England Category: Principal judgment Parties: WLD Practice Holdings Pty Ltd, in respect of the WLD Practice Holdings Trust (plaintiff) Sara Stockham (first defendant) Sara Stockham Pty Ltd (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Bova SC, D Reynolds (plaintiff) V Gray (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate