NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Darwin v Norman [2020] NSWSC 357 Hearing dates: 5-9 August 20193-4 October 2019 Date of orders: 08 April 2020 Decision date: 08 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: 1 Judgment for the second plaintiff against the first defendant for $200,000 dollars. 2 Judgment for the third plaintiff against the first defendant for $200,000 dollars. 3 Judgment for the first and second defendants against the fourth plaintiff. 4 The first defendant is to pay the second and third plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings. 5 The second and third plaintiffs are to bring in within 14 days a minute of the form of a permanent injunction against further defamatory publication by the first defendant. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defamatory matter – where material published in local newspaper and on the internet – where defendant admitted majority of pleaded imputations conveyed – remaining imputations found to have been conveyed – plaintiffs defamed – judgment for plaintiffs
DEFAMATION – defences – defence of justification not established
DEFAMATION – remedies – permanent injunction – aggravated damages Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Cases Cited: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158 Andrews v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR 225 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496 Trkulja v Google LLC [2018] HCA 25 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adrian Brennock - second plaintiff Phillip Dixon – third plaintiff Gillian Norman – first defendant Representation: Counsel: N Olsen - plaintiffs Gillian Norman - self represented 5-9 August 2019; J L Harrison 3-4 October 2019
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate