NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Cheraghi [2020] NSWCCA 70 Hearing dates: 14 February 2020 Date of orders: 15 April 2020 Decision date: 15 April 2020 Before: Simpson AJA; Beech-Jones J; N Adams J Decision: 1. Refuse leave to appeal against conviction. 2. Dismiss the appeal against conviction. 3. Grant leave to appeal against sentence. 4. Dismiss the appeal against sentence. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction — Direction about ERISP evidence of co-accused — Unanimous verdict — Whether not guilty is the default position for undecided jury — Appeal against sentence — Manifest Excess — Weight to be given to applicant's subjective circumstances — Aggravating factors — Relevance of time spent in immigration detention Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 112(2), s 148 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 5, s 21A, Part 3, Div 1A, s 44, s 47(2)(s), s 47(3), s 54B Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Jury Act 1977 (NSW), s 55F Cases Cited: Black v The Queen (1993) 179 CLR 44; [1993] HCA 71 Bland v R (2014) 241 A Crim R 51; [2014] NSWCCA 82 Magro v R [2020] NSWCCA 25 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Pham [2005] NSWCCA 94 Zreika v R (2012) 223 A Crim R 460; [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Edris Cheraghi (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Segal (Applicant) Ms F Williams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate