NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Storm Industries Pty Ltd trading as trustee of the T&L Trust v Unicar Australia Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2020] NSWDC 95 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 09 April 2020 Decision date: 09 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraphs 20-21 Catchwords: DAMAGES – misleading or deceptive conduct – individual defendants ordered to pay compensation – whether corporate defendant also liable to pay compensation
COSTS – multiple defendants – plaintiff succeeds against each individual defendant – plaintiff's success against third defendant more limited than its success against the second defendant – compensation orders reflected differing contributions to loss caused by second and third defendants – whether costs orders should also reflect contributions to loss – whether apportionment of costs should be ordered on account of plaintiff's failure in some of its complaints against third defendant Legislation Cited: Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r. 42.1 Cases Cited: Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Cellarit Pty Ltd v Cawarrah Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 266 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 Priestley v Priestley (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 1259 Priestley v Priestley (No. 2) [2017] NSWCA 212 Reinhold v New South Wales Lotteries Corporation (No. 2) (2008) 82 NSWLR 762 Storm Industries Pty Ltd trading as trustee of the T & L Trust v Unicar Australia Pty Ltd [2020] NSWDC 51 Texts Cited: Dal Pont, Law of Costs (Lexis Nexis, Butterworths, 2003) Hamilton & Ors, New South Wales Civil Procedure Handbook (Thomson Reuters, 2019) Category: Costs Parties: Storm Industries Pty Ltd trading as trustee of the T&L Trust (Plaintiff) Unicar Australia Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Mr M Tsingolis (Second Defendant) Mr C Radcliff (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr L Gyles SC and Ms A Campbell for the Plaintiff Mr D Tynan for the First and Second Defendants Dr E Peden SC for the Third Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate