NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Baker & Provan Defence Pty Limited v Supacat Pty Limited [2020] NSWSC 387 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 09 April 2020 Decision date: 09 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Henry J Decision: Costs of the plaintiff's notice of motion for discovery filed on 9 December 2019 be costs in the cause Catchwords: COSTS - cost orders in interlocutory proceedings - where discovery orders made by consent following hearing on some issues in dispute - where both parties achieved some success at the hearing - costs in the cause Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56-60, 98 Practice Note SC Eq 3 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.1, 42.7 Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2003] NSWSC 297 Cellarit Pty Ltd v Cawarrah Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 266 Gambro Pty Ltd v Fresenius Medical Care Australia Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 581 Hamod v State of New South Wales (2002) 188 ALR 659; [2002] FCA 424 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs: Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Baker & Provan Defence Pty Limited (plaintiff) Supacat Pty Limited (defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Sheldon (plaintiff) E Glover (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate