NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McGonigle v R [2020] NSWCCA 84 Hearing dates: 3 April 2020 Date of orders: 01 May 2020 Decision date: 01 May 2020 Before: McCallum JA at [1] Johnson J at [2] Adamson J at [149] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – sentence – offences of aggravated dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm and driving dangerously during a police pursuit – applicant's vehicle in near collision with police vehicle – police pursued applicant's vehicle over 8.1 kilometres on north coast country road – applicant drove up to 139 kilometres per hour with a blood alcohol content between 0.155 and 0.180 grammes per 100 millilitres of blood – applicant's vehicle spun out of control and collided with tree – passenger in applicant's vehicle ejected 39.5 metres away and suffered substantial injuries – aggregate sentence of imprisonment for four years and three months with non-parole period of two years and three months – whether aggregate sentence was manifestly excessive – where sentencing Judge had regard to the guideline judgment in R v Whyte – where there were two statutory aggravating factors under s.52A(7) Crimes Act 1900 of driving with prescribed concentration of alcohol and driving at a speed which exceeded the speed limit by 45 kph – substantial objective gravity of offences – where sentencing Judge had proper regard to the Applicant's strong subjective case – aggregate sentence not manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Road Transport Act 2013 Cases Cited: Brookes v R [2009] NSWCCA 265 Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v Dalgliesh (a Pseudonym) (2017) 262 CLR 428; [2017] HCA 41 Gray v R [2018] NSWCCA 39 JM v R (2014) 246 A Crim R 528; [2014] NSWCCA 297 Lawson v R [2018] NSWCCA 215 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Owen v R [2017] NSWCCA 54 Priovolidis v R [2016] NSWCCA 201 R v Carruthers (2008) 182 A Crim R 481; [2008] NSWCCA 59 R v Coffee [2010] NSWDC 261 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Glover [2011] NSWDC 65 R v Innes [2009] NSWDC 345 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v Kyle [2014] NSWCCA 300 R v MacPherson [2017] NSWDC 170 R v Palu (2002) 134 A Crim R 174; [2002] NSWCCA 381 R v Reay [2018] NSWDC 386 R v Tuhakaraina [2016] NSWCCA 81 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 Reddy v R [2018] NSWCCA 212 The Queen v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550; [2015] HCA 39 Ul-Hassan v R [2018] NSWCCA 177 Vale v R [2016] NSWCCA 154 Vandeventer v R [2013] NSWCCA 33 XZ v R [2018] NSWCCA 76 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark McGonigle (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr KH Averre MBE (Applicant) Mr D Patch (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate