NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Khalid v R [2020] NSWCCA 73 Hearing dates: 4 October 2019 Date of orders: 17 April 2020 Decision date: 17 April 2020 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Bell P at [99]; Harrison J at [100] Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal. (2) Allow the appeal. (3) Set aside the sentence imposed on the applicant and in lieu thereof sentence the applicant to a term of imprisonment of 20 years commencing on 23 December 2014 and expiring on 22 December 2034 with a non-parole period of 15 years expiring on 22 December 2029. Catchwords: CRIME – Terrorism offences – Conspiracy to do acts in preparation for a terrorist act or acts
CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – Sentencing judge erred by failing to take into account the utilitarian value of the applicant's plea of guilty – Resentence
SENTENCING – Relevant factors on sentence – Terrorism offences – Mitigating factors – Prospect of rehabilitation – Subjective factors –Youth of offender Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alou v R [2019] NSWCCA 231 Bae v R [2020] NSWCCA 35 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v MHK (No 1) (2017) 52 VR 272; [2017] VSCA 157 Elomar v R [2014] NSWCCA 303 Faheem Khalid Lodhi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 360; (2007) 179 A Crim R 470 Hili v R; Jones v R (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 IM v R [2019] NSWCCA 107 Jinde Huang aka Wei Liu v R [2018] NSWCCA 70 Johnson v The Queen [2004] HCA 15 R v Benbrika and Ors [2009] VSC 21 R v Elomar and Ors [2010] NSWSC 10 R v Fattal and Ors [2011] VSC 681 R v Khaja (No 5) [2018] NSWSC 238 R v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 691 R v Martin (1999) 1 Cr App Rep (S) 477 R v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550; [2015] HCA 39 Singh v R [2018] NSWCCA 60 Tyler v The Queen; R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247; (2007) 173 A Crim R 458 Xiao v R (2018) 96 NSWLR 1; [2018] NSWCCA 4 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sulayman Khalid (applicant) The Crown (respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Stratton SC with N Bennett (applicant) D K Jordan (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate