NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Artiel [2020] NSWDC 106 Hearing dates: 23 January 2020 Date of orders: 06 February 2020 Decision date: 06 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: See [59] Catchwords: SENTENCING – Robbery in circumstances of aggravation – Weapon, being a knife – On bail during offending – Homeless at time of the offending – Whether Henry guideline applies – Significant rehabilitation since offending – Whether ICO appropriate in the circumstances – Strong subjective case Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 97(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 5, 7, 10A, 21A, 22 Cases Cited: R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1; [2009] NSWCCA 102 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Murray v R [2013] NSWCCA 12 R v Douer (2005) 159 A Crim R 154 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 R v Papuni [2019] NSWDC 269 R v Gersbach [2018] NSWDC 341 R v SDM (2001) 51 NSWLR 530; [2001] NSWCCA 158 R v Blackman and Walters [2001] NSWCCA 121 R v Phillipe [2004] NSWCCA 2 Legge v R [2007] NSWCCA 244 MW v R [2010] NSWCCA 324 Tammer-Spence v R [2013] NSWCCA 297 R v Bugmy (2013) 249 CLR 571 Gardiner v R [2018] NSWCCA 27 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Jafar Alsadek Artiel (Offender) Representation: Counsel: Mr Z. Khan (for the Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate