NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Baladjam v R [2010] NSWCCA 102 Hearing dates: 5 May 2010 Decision date: 12 May 2010 Before: Hodgson JA Rothman J Barr AJ Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Application for leave to appeal against interlocutory order – Order protecting identity of ASIO witnesses – Application heard after their evidence given – Leave to appeal refused. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 5F Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Bradley Umar Sariff BALADJAM (applicant) CROWN (first respondent) DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF SECURITIES (second respondent) ATTORNEY-GENERAL (NSW) (third respondent) Representation: Counsel: P LANGE/ G SCRAGG (applicant) D ARNOTT SC/ G TABUTEAU (Crown) M WIGNEY SC (second respondent) Ms A MITCHELMORE (third respondent)
Solicitors: LawyersCorp Pty Ltd (applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions NSW (Crown) Australian Government Solicitor (second respondent) Office of the Crown Solicitor (third respondent) File Number(s): CCA 2006/11417 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 08 April 2010 Before: Charteris DCJ File Number(s): 2006/00011417
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate