NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BT Goldsmith Planning Services Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2005] NSWLEC 210 Hearing dates: 26/04/2005; 27/04/2005; 28/04/2005 Decision date: 01 July 2005 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pain J Decision: See paragraph [91] Catchwords: Development Application :- whether a species impact statement required - whether likely to significantly affect an endangered ecological community Legislation Cited: Blacktown Local Environment Plan 1988 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 5A, s 78A(8)(b), s 97 Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 s 6(2) Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 s 3, s 4, Sch 1, Sch 3 Cases Cited: BGP Properties Pty Limited v Lake Macquarie City Council [2004] NSWLEC 399; Conservation Council of South Australia v Development Assessment Committee and Tuna Boat Owners Association (No 2) [1999] SAERDC 86; Leatch v National Parks and Wildlife Service & Anor (1993) 81 LGERA 270; Murrumbidgee Ground-Water Preservation Association v Minister for Natural Resources [2004] NSWLEC 122; Plumb v Penrith City Council & Anor [2002] NSWLEC 223; Smyth v Nambucca Shire Council (1999) 105 LGERA 65; Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL & Ors (1999) 46 NSWLR 55 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: APPLICANT: BT Goldsmith Planning Services
RESPONDENT: Blacktown City Council Representation: APPLICANT: Mr T Hale SC SOLICITORS: Minter Ellison
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate