NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Manning v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 111 Hearing dates: 15 April 2020 Date of orders: 22 April 2020 Decision date: 22 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Emeritus Prof G D Walker, Senior Member Decision: (1) Decision under review affirmed. (2) Pursuant to ss 64(1)(c) and (d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the transcript and recording of the confidential hearing, confidential exhibits CR 2 and CR 3 and the contents of all paragraphs in these reasons marked "[Not for publication]" are not to be published or released to the applicant. Catchwords: LICENSING – firearms – licence revocation - breach of Firearms Act – fit and proper person – public interest. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Firearms Regulation 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 35, (1990) 170 CLR 321; Barlow v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] NSWADT 254; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 316; Bronze Wing International Pty Ltd v SafeWork New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 42; Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor (1995) 131 ALR 657; Director-General, Transport New South Wales v AIC (GD) [2011] NSWADTAP 65; Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60; Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith (1991) 1 VR 63; Esterman v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATOD 70; Fielden v Commissioner of police, New South Wales Police Service [2000] NSWADT 156; Hardy v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2006] NSWADT 167; Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127; Joseph v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCA 31; Kavalieratos v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 117; Kioa v West (1985) HCA 81, (1985) 159 CLR 550; Manning v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2020] NSWCATAD 9; Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10; O'Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210; Smith v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 184; Sterjovski v Director-General, Department of Transport [2002] NSWADT 10; Thomas v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 204; Webb v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2004] NSWADT 110. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Terrence J Manning (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: D Davidge (Applicant) Maddocks Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00320925 Publication restriction: Pursuant to ss 64(1)(c) and (d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the transcript and recordings of the confidential hearing, confidential exhibits CR 2 and CR 3 the contents of all paragraphs in these reasons marked "[Not for publication]" are not to be published or released to the applicant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate