NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWCA 72 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 22 April 2020 Decision date: 22 April 2020 Before: Payne, Brereton JJA Decision: (1) The notice of motion filed on 13 December 2019 is dismissed; (2) Applicant on the motion to pay the costs of the respondent; (3) Should the applicant seek to file any further application in this Court against the respondent in respect of the matters litigated in the proceedings dismissed by Kunc J or in the Court of Appeal, the applicant must at the same time file a document of no more than five pages showing cause why this Court should not in chambers summarily dismiss the application as vexatious and an abuse of process. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – judgments and orders – amending, varying and setting aside – where no basis for application – where application restates matters addressed in impugned judgment Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 36.15, 36.16, 36.17, 36.18 Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v Sahab Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] HCA 44; (2013) 87 ALJR 1159 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Hacide Pty Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Sully J, 28 November 1989, unrep) Elliott v The Queen (2007) 234 CLR 38; [2007] HCA 51 Government Insurance Offıce (NSW) v Rosniak (1992) 27 NSWLR 665 Hacide Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1991] NSWCA 134 Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235; [1956] HCA 27 In Re St Nazaire Co (1879) 12 Ch D 88 Murray v Figge (1974) 4 ALR 612 New South Wales Bar Association v Smith [1991] NSWCA 215 Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 290 Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd [2019] NSWCA 241 Poulos v Elliot [2019] NSWSC 423 Power v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 77; (2014) 98 ATR 75 Raybos Australia Pty Ltd v Tectran Corp Pty Ltd [1993] NSWCA 226 Re Barrell Enterprises [1973] 1 WLR 19; [1972] 3 All ER 631 Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256; [1992] HCA 36 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 29; [1982] HCA 51 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 8) [2014] NSWCA 125 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 6) [2012] NSWCA 260 The Texas Company (Australasia) Ltd v The Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1940) 63 CLR 382; [1940] HCA 9 Watson v Metropolitan (Perth) Passenger Transport Trust [1965] WAR 88 Wentworth v Rogers (No 9) (1987) 8 NSWLR 388 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672; [1982] HCA 41 Winrobe Pty Ltd v Sundin's Building Co Pty Ltd (No 2) [1992] NSWCA 278 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patricia Poulos (Applicant) Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (Self-represented) F Roughley (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate