NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Cormack [2020] NSWDC 128 Hearing dates: 25 February 2020 Decision date: 25 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence of three years and seven months. Non-parole period of one year and seven months Catchwords: SENTENCING – Multiple offences - assault with intent to take motor vehicle - aggravated enter with intent - intimidation - Form 1 matters - s 166 Criminal Procedure Act matters.
SENTENCING – relevant factors on sentence – late guilty plea - - Form 1 - bizarre but intimidatory behaviour by the offender towards victim - offender not himself - offender's mental condition - drug use - considerable help needed to adjust to normal community life - special circumstances - accumulation on other sentences - need to preserve ratio between total effective sentence and total non-parole period - no need for rigid percentage deductions when reducing sentences for guilty plea Legislation Cited: Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) 2007 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 R v Jason Cormack, unreported NSWDC, 4 May 2018, Haesler SC DCJ Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Category: Sentence Parties: Jason Scott Cormack (the offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr S Fraser, Public Defender (for the offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate