NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Bahmad [2020] NSWSC 439 Hearing dates: 21 April 2020 Decision date: 21 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: 1. The first defendant is to comply with Order 18 of the orders made by this Court on 19 December 2019 by 19 May 2020. 2. These proceedings are stood over to join with a related proceeding that is before the Court on 28 May 2020. 3. Liberty to restore on three days' notice. 4. Costs of and incidental to today reserved. Catchwords: CRIME – proceeds of crime – extension of time to comply with orders under s 39(1) of Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) – concern at tardiness and lack of good faith – lesser extension granted Legislation Cited: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), s 39(1) Cases Cited: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Cranston and Ors (No. 2) [2017] NSWSC 673 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) James Ali Bahmad (First Defendant) Assia Investments Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Susan Bahmad (Fourth Defendant) Tony Antonios (Third Respondent) Jhonny Ayoub (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms J Taylor (Plaintiff) Ms J Antonopoulos (First, Second & Fourth Defendants) Mr S Stanton (Third & Fourth Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate