NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Abel v R [2020] NSWCCA 82 Hearing dates: 4 March 2020 Decision date: 01 May 2020 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Button J at [6]; Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence refused. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – unorthodox procedural history – where s 68 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) originally precluded the making of an intensive correction order (ICO) – Form 1 "withdrawn" – ICO ultimately imposed –whether judge erred in failing to find good prospects of rehabilitation and unlikelihood of reoffending – whether error made in assessment of the objective gravity of offences – whether sentence featuring ICO was manifestly excessive – analysis of aspects of procedure adopted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193(C)(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 68 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(1) Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Cross v R [2019] NSWCCA 280 R v Pullen [2018] NSWCCA 264 R v Qi [2019] NSWCCA 73 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jacob Abel (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lange (Applicant) A McGrath (Respondent)
Solicitors: Kings Law Group (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/370086 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 29 May 2019 Before: Delaney ADCJ File Number(s): 2017/370086
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate