NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McTague v R [2020] NSWCCA 83 Hearing dates: 6 March 2020 Date of orders: 01 May 2020 Decision date: 01 May 2020 Before: Meagher JA at [1] Harrison J at [2] Button J at [53] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence –comparison between roles of co-offenders – whether error in assessment of objective seriousness – whether due consideration of specific deterrence – whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985 (NSW) Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Delleci v R [2020] NSWCCA 4 Fenech v R [2018] NSWCCA 160 Grabovac v R [2018] NSWCCA 100 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Laughton v R [2019] NSWCCA 318 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Ninness v R [2014] NSWCCA 288 Pak v R [2015] NSWCCA 45 Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284; 96 NSWLR 633 Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242; (2011) 219 A Crim R 104 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 Stines v R [2019] NSWCCA 115 Vaiusu v R [2017] NSWCCA 71 Vaughan v R [2020] NSWCCA 3 Weinand v R [2013] NSWCCA 202 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel McTague (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Paingakulam (Applicant) C Curtis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate