NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Westpac Banking Corporation v Southern Environmental Services Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 448 Hearing dates: 25-28 March; 23 April; 13 May 2019 Decision date: 28 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ierace J Decision: (1) The cross-claim be dismissed.
(2) The cross-claimant to pay the cross-defendants' costs of these proceedings. Catchwords: TORTS – interference with goods – conversion –whether cross-claimant had a right to possession – whether goods were abandoned – whether estoppel in pais applies – damages not awarded
TORTS – interference with goods – detinue – whether cross-claimant had a right to possession – whether failure to comply with a demand – no damages awarded Legislation Cited: Uncollected Goods Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570; [2008] HCA 57 BIS Cleanaway (trading as CHEP) & Ors v Tatale & Anor; Brambles (trading as CHEP) v Tatale & Anor [2007] NSWSC 378 Thompson v Palmer (1933) 49 CLR 507; [1933] HCA 61 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Westpac Banking Corporation (Plaintiff) Southern Environmental Services Pty Ltd (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Gyressa Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Paul Thomas Cambage Wenham (Third Defendant) Gloucester 103 Holdings Pty Ltd (First Cross-Defendant) Klondu Group Pty Ltd (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Robertson (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant, Second Defendant, Third Defendant) A d'Arville (First and Second Cross-Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate