NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Goldberg v Voigt [2020] NSWDC 174 Hearing dates: 13-14 February 2020 Date of orders: 07 May 2020 Decision date: 07 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Weinstein SC DCJ Decision: I award the plaintiff the sum of $35,000 in damages for defamation. I will hear the parties on the question of costs. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant the sum of $8,000 as a fixed sum for her costs incurred in proceedings 2019/00294969. Catchwords: Defamation – Application for assessment of damages - offer to make amends out of time – statement of claim as concerns notice – Facebook publication– closed group – serious imputations including killer and stalker of women – limited dissemination – grapevine effect Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 Cases Cited: Bolton v Stoltenberg [2018] NSWSC 1518 Carson v John Fairfax & Sons (1993) 178 CLR 44 Collier v Country Women's Association of NSW [2017] NSWSC 1573 Consolidated Trust Co Ltd v Browne (1948) 49 SR (NSW) 86 Cripps v Vakras [2014] VSC 279 Hockey v Fairfax Media [2015] FCA 652 Mohareb v Booth [2020] NSWCA 49 Palmer Bruyn & Parker v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496 Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497 Zoef v Nationwide News PTY Ltd [2016] NSWCA 283 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bruce Goldberg (Plaintiff) Alice Voigt (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Matthew Richardson (Plaintiff) Mr Keiran Smark SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate