NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v CS [2019] NSWDC 875 Hearing dates: 20 September 2019 Date of orders: 20 September 2019 Decision date: 20 September 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Judge W Hunt Decision: The unfair prejudice outweighs the probative value of the evidence and therefore the defence application to exclude the evidence is granted. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Judgment - Application to exclude evidence – Pretext phone call - Surveillance Device Warrant - Recorded telephone conversations between complainant and accused – Oppressive conduct – Admission obtained in consequence of impropriety - Coercive behaviour – Proper records not maintained by police with regards to surveillance device – Coercive and threatening texts – Unfairness - Misleading statements – Falsehoods told by the complainant to the accused – General right to silence subverted – Denial of procedural rights – Complainant regarded as agent of the State Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act, 1995 Surveillance Devices Act, 2007 UN Charter of Human Rights Cases Cited: Christie v Leachinsky [1947] AC 573 DRF v R [2015] NSWCCA 181 DSJ v R and NS v R [2012] NSWCCA 9 Duke v The Queen [1989] 180 CLR 508 EM v The Queen [2007] 232 CLR 67 Em v The Queen [2007] HCA 46 Employment Advocate v Williamson [2001] 111 FCR 20 Habib v Nationwide News (2010) 76 NSWLR 299 Higgins v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 56 Juric (2002) 129 A Crim R 408 Pascoe v Little (1983) 3SASR 211 Patel v The Queen [2012] 247 CLR 531 Pavic v R (1997) 192 CLR 159 Pavitt v R (2007) 169 A Crim R 452 Pfennig v The Queen [1995] 182 CLR 461 R v Broyles [1991] 3 S.C.R 595 R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335 R v Dewhirst [2001] VSC 172; 122 A Crim R 403 R v DRF [2015] NSWCCA 181 R v GH (2000) 105 FCR 419 R v Heaney & Welsh [1998] 4 VR 636 at para 647. R v Helmhout (No 2) 2000 NSWSC 225 R v Herbert [1992] SCR 151 R v JF [2017] NSWCCA 217 R v Juric [2002] VACA 77; 129 A Crim R 408 R v Laird (1839) NSWLR 354 R v Lee [1950] 82 CLR 133 R v Paris (1993) 97 CR App R 99 R v Smith (1959) 2QB 35 R v Swaffield [1998] HCA 1; 192 CLR 159; 151 ALR 98; 72 ALJR 339 (20 January 1998) R v William Anderson (2008) QDC 137 R v Ye Zhang [2000] NSWSC 1099 Roba (2000) 110 A Crim R 253 Van Der Meer v The Queen [1998] 62 ALJR 656 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions CS Representation: Counsel: Mr A McCarthy – Crown Mr P Strickland SC, with Ms A Francis - Accused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate