NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of NSW v Hunt (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 456 Hearing dates: 15 April 2020 Decision date: 30 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Decision: Two experts appointed to provide reports and Interim Supervision Order made for 28 days with conditions. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – serious sex offender – application for Interim Supervision Order – defendant has multiple convictions for sexual abuse of young girls – dispute as to conditions to be imposed – some conditions intrusive – identity of risk posed – community safety paramount – whether privilege against self-incrimination abrogated by statute. Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offender Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) – s 17(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 61M(2), s 66C(1), s 66M(2) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57; 91 NSWLR 636 Petty and Maiden v The Queen [1991] HCA 34; 173 CLR 95 State of New South Wales v Ambrym (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 298 State of New South Wales v Baldwin [2019] NSWSC 1882 State of New South Wales v Elomar (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1034 State of NSW v Golding (Preliminary) [2018] NSWSC 1041 State of New South Wales v Strong, Robert [2018] NSWSC 1113 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales – Plaintiff Robert John Hunt – Defendant Representation: Counsel: K Curry – Plaintiff N Broadbent – Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate