NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Jones (Final) [2020] NSWSC 461 Hearing dates: 7 April 2020 Decision date: 29 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ierace J Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 17(1b) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the defendant be the subject of a continuing detention order for a period of 1 year to date from 29 April 2020.
(2) Pursuant to s 20(1) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the Court to issue a warrant for the committal of the defendant to a correctional centre for a period of 1 year.
(3) Access to the Supreme Court's file in respect of any document shall not be granted to a non-party without the leave of a Judge of the Court, and, if any application for access is made by a non-party in respect of any document, the parties are to be notified by the Registrar so as to allow them an opportunity to be heard in relation to the application of access. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – final hearing – application for continuing detention order or extended supervision order – interim supervision order previously made – whether unacceptable risk of committing another serious sexual offence – whether sufficient resources to maintain high level of supervision in the community – continuing detention order imposed Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Amendment Act 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Jones [2018] NSWSC 459 State of New South Wales v Jones [2020] NSWSC 51 State of New South Wales v Lynn [2015] NSWSC 665 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 11 October 2017 at 273 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Michael David Jones (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D New (Plaintiff) E Kerkyasharian; R El-Choufani (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate