NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Benidorm Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2020] NSWSC 471 Hearing dates: 18 December 2019 Date of orders: 30 April 2020 Decision date: 30 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ward CJ in Eq Decision: 1. The defendant's assessment dated 6 March 2019, which assessed a deed made on 29 January 2015 between the plaintiff and Derek Stubbs (described as "Declaration of Trust by Nominee" with ad valorem duty, be revoked pursuant to s 101(1)(a) of the Taxation Administration Act 1997 (NSW). 2. The defendant repay any duty paid under the Principal Assessment with interest pursuant to s 101(1)(e) of the Taxation Administration Act 1997 (NSW). 3. The defendant pay the costs of this proceeding pursuant to s 101(1)(e) of the Taxation Administration Act 1997 (NSW) and s 98 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW). Catchwords: REVENUE — Stamp duties — whether declaration of trust dutiable transaction where only acknowledges statutory vesting
REVENUE — Stamp duties — duty on declaration of trust — application of exemptions and nominal duty provisions Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Duties Act 1997 (NSW) ss 8, 9, 11, 18, 50, 54, 55, 63, 652, 163H Duties Act 2008 (WA), s 11 Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW), ss 44, 47 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Stamp Duties Act 1894 (Qld) Stamp Duties Act 1920 (NSW) Cases Cited: Barron (Inspector of Taxes ) v Littman [1953] AC 96 Boensch v Pascoe [2019] HCA 49; (2019) 375 ALR 15 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242; [1984] HCA 81 Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v ISPT Pty Ltd (1998) 45 NSWLR 639 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Platinum Investment Management Ltd (2011) 80 NSWLR 240; [2011] NSWCA 48 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Buckle (1998) 192 CLR 226; [1998] HCA 4 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Pendal Nominees Pty Ltd (1989) 167 CLR 1 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Queensland) v Hopkins (1945) 71 CLR 351; [1945] HCA 14 Commissioner of State Revenue v Rojoda Pty Ltd [2020] HCA 7 Crowther v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) [1978] 1 NSWLR 82 Davidson (Collector of Imposts) v Chirnside (1908) 7 CLR 324; [1908] HCA 65 DKLR Holding Co (No 2) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 431; [1982] HCA 14 Fair Work Ombudsman v Spotless Services Australia Ltd [2019] FCA 9 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Clark (2011) 190 FCR 206; [2011] FCAFC 5 Fremantle Lawyers Pty Ltd v Sarich (2019) 54 WAR 113; [2019] WASCA 48 Harvey v Barton (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 809 King v Denison (1813) 1 Ves & B 260 Octavo Investments Pty Ltd v Knight (1979) 144 CLR 360; [1979] HCA 61 Official Receiver in Bankruptcy v Schultz (1990) 170 CLR 306; [1990] HCA 45 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Re Blow [1914] 1 Ch 233 Rinehart v Rinehart [2020] NSWSC 68 Rojoda Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2018] WASCA 224; (2018) 368 ALR 734 Stokes v Churchill; Estate of Fryer (1994) NSW ConvR 55- 694 Toohey's Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1960) 60 SR (NSW) 539 Tooheys Limited v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) (1961) 105 CLR 602; [1961] HCA 35 Walsh Bay Developments Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1995) 31 ATR 15 Wedge v Acting Comptroller of Stamps (Victoria) (1941) 64 CLR 75; [1941] HCA 1 Winston-Smith v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2018] NSWSC 773 Texts Cited: J D Heydon & M J Leeming, Jacobs' Law of Trusts in Australia (7th ed, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006) J D Heydon and M J Leeming, Jacobs' Law of Trusts in Australia (8th ed, 2016, LexisNexis Butterworths) Justice R White, "The Nature of a Beneficiary's Equitable Interest in a Trust" [2007] New South Wales Judicial Scholarship 12 The Macquarie Dictionary (3rd ed, 1997, Macquarie Library) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Benidorm Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Bevan with I Sethi (Plaintiff) R Seiden SC with S Kanagaratnam (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate