NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lipscombe v Blue Mountains City Council [2020] NSWCATAD 121 Hearing dates: 3 April 2019; 5 August 2019; 28 October 2019; 16 December 2019 Date of orders: 04 May 2020 Decision date: 04 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Government Information (Public Access) Act -– legal professional privilege – whether privilege waived Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Evidence Act 1995 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 Cases Cited: Attorney General (NT) v Maurice and Others (1986) 161 CLR CHU Underwriting Pty Ltd v Hunter Water Corporation [2018] NSWCATAD 273 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Mannix v Department of Education and Communities [2014] NSWCATAD 35 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Lipscombe (Applicant) Blue Mountains City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Singleton (Respondent)
Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) McPhee Kelshaw (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00355062 Publication restriction: Section 64(d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies to the material that was received by the Tribunal on a confidential basis.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate