NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sabbah v R (Cth) [2020] NSWCCA 89 Hearing dates: 27 March 2020 Date of orders: 06 May 2020 Decision date: 06 May 2020 Before: McCallum JA at [1] Wilson J at [11] Cavanagh J at [158] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME – Sentence – application for leave to appeal against asserted excessiveness of sentence – possession of counterfeit money – utility of sentencing statistics based on small sample – utility of decided cases in determining whether sentence is manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Currency) Act 1981 (Cth) Reserve Bank Act 1959 (Cth) Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2 Dang v R [2014] NSWCCA 47 Dinsdale v The Queen 202 CLR 321, [2000] HCA 54 DPP v Kevin Rohde and Others (1985) 17 A Crim R 166 Hoare v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 348; [1989] HCA 33 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Lowndes v The Queen 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 29 MLP v R [2014] NSWCCA 183 Markarian v The Queen 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Naveed v R [2019] NSWCCA 149 Ngatamariki v R [2016] NSWCCA O'Keefe v R (1993) 67 A Crim R 381 Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284 Pham v R [2014] NSWCCA 115 R v Eddie Ali Shaitly (District Court of NSW, 3 October 1996, unrep) R v Geaney (District Court of NSW, 27 October 1995, unrep) R v Gittani [2002] NSWCCA 139 R v Institoris (2002) 129 A Crim R 458, [2002] NSWCCA 8 R v Meades (District Court of NSW 29 June 2000, unrep) R v Megaloudis [2013] NSWDC 302 R v Oppedisano (District Court of NSW 27 October 1995, unrep). R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 The Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39 Vandeventer v R [2013] NSWCCA 33 Vaiusu v R [2017] NSWCCA 71 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Wong v The Queen 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Henry Sabbah (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Crawford-Fish (Applicant) Mr R J Perrignon (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate