NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ibbotson (a pseudonym) v R [2020] NSWCCA 92 Hearing dates: 18 March 2020 Date of orders: 08 May 2020 Decision date: 08 May 2020 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Rothman J at [22]; N Adams J at [127] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted;
(2) Appeal allowed;
(3) The sentence imposed on the Applicant by the District Court on 24 April 2019 be quashed and in lieu thereof the Court impose the following sentence:
(i) An aggregate sentence of 5 years and 6 months' imprisonment commencing on 23 March 2019 and concluding on 22 September 2024, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 9 months concluding on 22 December 2021;
(ii) The Applicant will be first eligible for parole on 22 December 2021. Catchwords: CRIME – Sentence Appeal – application of discount for plea to aggregate sentence and not to indicative sentences – failure to specify non-parole period for each sentence having a Standard Non-Parole Period – manifest excess Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61M(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 22, 45(1A) 53A, 54B, 101A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment Act 2007 (NSW), Schedule 1, item 10 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Berryman v R [2017] NSWCCA 297 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Elsaj v R [2017] NSWCCA 124 Galvin v R [2015] NSWCCA 88 GR v R [2018] NSWCCA 280 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; 246 A Crim R 528 Johan v R [2019] NSWCCA 126 Johnson v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 616; [2004] HCA 15 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Kentwell v The Queen (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 96 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59; [1988] HCA 70 Mundine v R [2017] NSWCCA 97 Newman (a pseudonym) v R [2019] NSWCCA 157 Parente v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 633; [2017] NSWCCA 284 PB v R [2016] NSWCCA 258 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 PG v R [2017] NSWCCA 179 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 SHR v R [2014] NSWCCA 94; 241 A Crim R 544 Sutton v R [2016] NSWCCA 249 Taitoko v R [2020] NSWCCA 43 Truong v R; R v Le; Nguyen v R; R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 36 Vaughan v R [2020] NSWCCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ibbotson (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Evers (Applicant) G A Newton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate