NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smogurzewski v AIT Investment Group Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 490 Hearing dates: 1 April 2020 Date of orders: 05 May 2020 Decision date: 05 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Plaintiff not entitled to rescind contract. Contract remains on foot. No order to be made for return of deposit. Catchwords: LAND LAW – conveyancing – contract for sale – off-the-plan purchase – purchase of home unit and carspace – where home unit constructed as an adaptable unit and carspace marked with symbol for disabled persons access – purchaser rescinds contract under rule in Flight v Booth – whether presence of symbol means that owner would not have exclusive use of carspace or gave rise to risk of unauthorised use – held that owner would have exclusive right to possess and enjoy carspace – held that owner would have right to remove or conceal the symbol – purchaser not entitled to rescind contract – contract remains on foot – no warrant for deposit to be returned to purchaser
MISLEADING OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT – off-the-plan purchase of home unit and carspace – purchaser not informed that unit would be constructed as an adaptable unit and that carspace would be marked with symbol for disabled persons access – not shown that at time of contract vendor had that intention – no false or misleading representations made by vendor – conduct of vendor not misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law, ss 18 and 30 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 55(2A) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 149 Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), s 650A Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), s 271 Cases Cited: Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378 Flight v Booth (1834) 1 Bing NC 370 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 357; [2010] HCA 31 Victorsen v Easy Living Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1721 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adam Josef Smogurzewski (Plaintiff) AIT Investment Group Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S A Wells (Plaintiff) Mr P Folino-Gallo (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate