NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Linney v Solomou [2020] NSWSC 499 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 06 May 2020 Decision date: 06 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ward CJ in Eq Decision: 1. Dismiss with costs the notice of motion filed on 2 March 2020 by the plaintiff. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Interim preservation — Freezing orders Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), s 128 Limitations Act 1969 (NSW), s 16 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 25.11, 25.14 Cases Cited: Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380; [1999] HCA 18 Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA [1980] 1 All ER 213 Poulos v Pellicer; In the Estate of Culina [2004] NSWSC 504 Re C & L Cameron Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 676 Severstal Export GmbH v Bhushan Steel Ltd (2013) 84 NSWLR 141; [2013] NSWCA 102 Texts Cited: Practice Note SC Gen 14 Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Irene Linney (Plaintiff) Nicholas Solomou (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E White (Plaintiff) B Regener (Defendant)
Solicitors: Lighthouse Law Group (Plaintiff) Young and Muggleton (Defendant) File Number(s): 2019/00261565 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate