NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bloore v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2020] NSWSC 502 Hearing dates: 1 May 2020 Date of orders: 06 May 2020 Decision date: 06 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Revenue List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Summons dismissed Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES – Duties Act 1997 (NSW) s 63 – will of mother divided residuary estate equally between three siblings who were also executors – executors agreed to appropriate one of four properties in residuary estate to plaintiff – where value of that property exceeded one third of the then value of estate – whether such appropriation was in or towards satisfaction of plaintiff's entitlement under the will – whether the beneficiaries thereby agreed to vary the trusts in the will Legislation Cited: Duties Act 1997 (NSW) State Legislation Amendment Bill 2008 (NSW) Taxation Administration Act 1986 (NSW) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alexander v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2017] NSWCATAD 180 Clyne v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 150 CLR 1; [1981] HCA 40 Foots v Southern Cross Mine Management Pty Ltd (2007) 234 CLR 52; [2007] HCA 56 House of Peace Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council (2000) 48 NSWLR 498; [2000] NSWCA 44 McGraw-Hinds (Aust) Pty Ltd v Smith (1979) 144 CLR 633; [1979] HCA 19 Tay v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2017] NSWSC 338 Texts Cited: F Barlow, R Wallington, SL Meadway, J MacDougald and C Kynaston, Williams on Wills (10th ed, 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) J D Heydon and M J Leeming MJ, Jacob's Law of Trusts in Australia (7th ed, 2006, LexisNexis Butterworths Australia) D Hughes and K Lewison, The Interpretation of Contracts in Australia (2012, Thomson Reuters) J R Martyn and N Caddick QC, Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks on Executors, Administrators and Probate, (20th ed, 2013, Sweet and Maxwell) Concise Oxford English Dictionary (2011, Oxford University Press) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Virginia Marie Tomlinson Bloore (Plaintiff) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B DeBuse (Plaintiff) M Sealey (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate