NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Foundas v Arambatzis (No. 3) [2020] NSWCA 87 Hearing dates: On the papers: Appellant's submissions 2 April 2020; First Respondent's submissions 8 April 2020; Second Respondent's submissions 9 April 2020 Decision date: 07 May 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Basten JA at [2]; White JA at [3] Decision: Application to set aside order 8 made on 24 March 2020 dismissed with costs. Catchwords: LAND LAW — Co-ownership — whether order to pay occupation rent ought to be set aside – where the trustee was not the registered proprietor at the time the demand for occupation rent was made – effect of an order under s 66G Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) on the rights of a co-owner – order not set aside Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66G Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 86 Cases Cited: Abbott v Pegler (1980) 1 BPR 9267 Application of Richard Albarran; Harb v Harb [2010] NSWSC 1251 Foundas v Arambatzis (No. 2) [2020] NSWCA 51 Foundas v Arambatzis [2020] NSWCA 47 Luke v Luke (1936) 36 SR(NSW) 310 Nullagine Investments Pty Ltd v Western Australian Club Inc (1992) 177 CLR 635; [1992] HCA 45 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Cassiani Foundas (Appellant) Peter Arambatzis (First Respondent) Sean Magnus Wengel and Robert William Whitton (Second Respondents) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Appellant) D Barlin (First Respondent) R Ishak, Solicitor (Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate