NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: DGF Property Holdings Pty Limited v Di Federico (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 510 Hearing dates: 21, 22 November 2019; final submissions received 27 April 2020 Decision date: 08 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Emmett AJA Decision: See paragraph [147] Catchwords: CONTRACTS — Remedies — Damages — Assessment — Re-opening case — Assessment of damages upon further evidence adduced by parties — Delay to development project caused by breach — Whether plaintiff entitled to claim full period of delay for purposes of determining damages based on evidence — Calculation of land taxes incurred over period
CORPORATIONS — Formation — Pre-registration contracts — Whether evidence established that "a person" purported to enter a contract on behalf of or for the benefit of a company prior to registration — Whether conduct of company shareholders and director capable of ratifying purported agreements after registration — Requirements of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 131 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 100 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66ZL Conveyancing Legislation Amendment Act 2018 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 131 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 121B Cases Cited: BJ McAdam Pty Ltd v Jax Tyres Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1438 Black v Smallwood (1966) 117 CLR 52 Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 DGF Property Holdings Pty Limited v Di Federico; DGF Property Holdings Pty Limited v Butros [2018] NSWSC 344 DGF Property Holdings Pty Limited v Di Federico; DGF Property Holdings Pty Limited v Butros (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1137 Ex parte Harper; re Rosenfield [1964-5] NSWLR 58 Kelner v Baxter (1866) LR 2 CP 174 Painaway Australia Pty Ltd v JAKL Group Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 205 Re Express Engineering Works Ltd [1920] 1 Ch 466; [1920] All ER Rep Ext 850 Sydney Appliances Pty Limited (in liquidation) v Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 32; 33 ACSR 680 Verschures Creameries Limited v Hull & Netherlands Steamship Company Limited [1921] 2 KB 608 Texts Cited: Gino Dal Pont, Law of Agency (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2014) [5.29] and [5.31] W Bowstead, FMB Reynolds, P Watts, Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency (19th ed, 2010, Sweet & Maxwell), [2-071] Category: Principal judgment Parties: DGF Property Holdings Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Enzo Di Federico (First Defendant) Franca Di Federico (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P M Barham (Plaintiff) M A Ashhurst SC (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate