NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Young v Richmond Valley Council [2020] NSWSC 514 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 08 May 2020 Decision date: 08 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Plaintiff's Statement of Claim ordered to be struck out. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — summary disposal — dismissal of proceedings — claim to ownership of lands by virtue of adverse possession – Defendant Council contends that claim is bound to fail because lands are public roads that vested in it pursuant to s 232 of the Local Government Act 1919 (NSW) and remain so vested pursuant to s 145(3) of the Roads Act 1993 (NSW) – whether roads closed in 1963 pursuant to Public Roads Act 1902 (NSW) – where evidence of historical ownership of lands not sufficient to show that Plaintiff's claim will almost certainly fail – proceedings not appropriate for summary dismissal
CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings — striking out – plaintiff filed Statement of Claim claiming entitlement to lands by virtue of adverse possession – lands claimed not precisely identified or defined – lands in part owned by State of New South Wales – State not joined as a party to proceedings – Statement of Claim does not recite material facts to show how title by adverse possession came to be acquired by Plaintiff – Statement of Claim plainly inadequate for the purpose of identifying Plaintiff's claims to ownership of lands by adverse possession – appropriate to order that Statement of Claim be struck out – leave granted to file amended Statement of Claim Legislation Cited: Local Government Act 1919 (NSW), ss 224(3)(d), 232 Public Roads Act 1902 (NSW) Roads (Public) Act 1833 (NSW) (4 William IV No 11) Roads Act 1993 (NSW), s 145(3) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 13.4, 14.28 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552; [2000] HCA 41 Casson v Leichhardt Council (2011) 186 LGERA 34; [2011] NSWLEC 243 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 Weber v Ankin [2008] NSWSC 106 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Gary Young (Plaintiff) Richmond Valley Council (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Fitzpatrick (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate