NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R (Cth) v Cooper [2020] NSWSC 515 Hearing dates: 01 May 2020 Date of orders: 08 May 2020 Decision date: 08 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: The offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 28 years with a non-parole period of 18 years, to date from 25 December 2016. Catchwords: CRIME – SENTENCE AFTER TRIAL – conspiracy to import a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug – verdicts of guilty to two counts at trial – very high level offending – agreement to import substantial quantities of cocaine – sophisticated plan for importations by sea – offender Australian agent for international source of drugs – parity with other conspirators – role of general deterrence Legislation Cited: Courts Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Code (Cth) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth). Cases Cited: Chen v R [2002] NSWCCA 174; (2002) 130 A Crim R 300 De la Espriella-Velasco v The Queen (2006) 31 WAR 291; [2006] WASCA 31 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Melgar Sevilla v The Queen [2007] WASCA 116 R (Cth) v Li [2005] NSWCCA 154 R v Bartle [2003] NSWCCA 329; (2003) 181 FLR 1 R v Elfar & Golding [2017] QCA 170 R v Ismunandar; R v Siregar [2002] NSWCCA 477; (2002) 136 A Crim R 206 R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238; (2010) 205 A Crim R 106 R v [Person A], [Person C] & Tobin [2018] NSWSC 1953 R v Reaves [2004] WASCA 106; (2004) 147 A Crim R 26 R v Suarez-Mejia [2002] WASCA 187; (2002) 131 A Crim R 577 R v Tait and Bartley (1979) 46 FLR 386 Sukkar v The Queen (No 2) (2008) 178 A Crim R 433; [2008] WASCA 2 Teng v The Queen (2009) 22 VR 706; [2009] VSCA 148 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Thompson v R [2007] NSWCCA 83 Velez v R (Cth) [2015] NSWCCA 177 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Jonathon Cooper (Accused) Representation: Counsel: H Barclay QC/Mr S Howell (Crown) D Randle (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate