NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ashworth v McSweeney [2020] NSWLEC 50 Hearing dates: 07 May 2020 Date of orders: 07 May 2020 Decision date: 07 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [13] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Ex parte injunction — Urgent injunction sought to restrain tree removal — Balance of convenience where tree removal already in progress — Injunctive relief granted Legislation Cited: Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 (NSW) cl 5.10 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 25.2 Cases Cited: Beecham Group Limited v Bristol Laboratories Pty Limited (1968) 118 CLR 618; [1968] HCA 1 Health Care Complaints Commission v Sultan [2018] NSWCA 303 Iseek Communications Pty Ltd v Jones [2017] NSWSC 251 Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana; In the Estate of Nadia Mekhail (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1175 Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Tegra (NSW) Pty Ltd v Gundagai Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 806; (2007) 160 LGERA 1 Texts Cited: Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (5th ed 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Faye Ashworth (Applicant) David McSweeney (First Respondent) City of Sydney (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel S Robertson (Applicant) No appearance (First Respondent) No appearance (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00136332 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate