NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v JM [2020] NSWDC 179 Hearing dates: 6 May 2020 Date of orders: 06 May 2020 Decision date: 06 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 19 Catchwords: EVIDENCE – application to lead tendency evidence – objection to cross-admissibility of tendency evidence as between complainants – whether tendency alleged is too general – whether tendency evidence is of significant probative value Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 55, 97, 101 Cases Cited: Hughes v The Queen (2017) 92 ALJR 52; [2017] HCA 20 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300 McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52 R v Bauer (a pseudonym) (2018) 92 ALJR 846 Texts Cited: Odgers, Uniform Evidence Law, 14th ed, Thomson Reuters Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions Mr JM Representation: Counsel: Mr J Peach for the Director of Public Prosecutions Mr J O'Sullivan for the accused
Solicitors: Solicitor for the Director of Public Prosecutions Virginia Taylor Partners File Number(s): 2017/338111 Publication restriction: Non Publication Order on the names of the complainants, the accused and each of the complainants' and the accused's family members, or any information that may identify any of them. Pseudonyms have been used for the names of the complainants, the accused, and each of the family members of the complainants and the accused.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate