Stojanovski v Stojanovski (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 558

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Stojanovski v Stojanovski (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 558 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 13 May 2020 Decision date: 13 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See par [48]. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Summary disposal — Dismissal of proceedings — where the Court has an inherent power to decide whether to entertain an application by a party for the review and withdrawal or variation of findings and reasons contained in a judgment that has been published – where the plaintiff sought such a review – where this was refused per the principles in Elliott v R (2007) 234 CLR 38; [2007] HCA 51 Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Cases Cited: Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256; [2006] HCA 27 Elliott v R (2007) 234 CLR 38; [2007] HCA 51 Metropolitan Bank Ltd v Pooley (1885) 10 App Cas 210 Stojanovski v Stojanovski [2019] NSWSC 1713 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480; [2013] HCA 43 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Steven Stojanovski (plaintiff) Robert Stojanovski (first defendant) Jovanka Stojanovski (second defendant) Jordan Stojanovski (third defendant) Angelina Stojanovski (fourth defendant/cross-defendant) Fabian Kane Micheletto (fifth defendant/first cross-claimant) Michael Carrafa (sixth defendant/second cross-claimant) Representation: Counsel: