NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ALS131 Pty Ltd v Rahme [2020] NSWSC 569 Hearing dates: 12 & 14 May 2020 Date of orders: 14 May 2020 Decision date: 14 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fullerton J Decision: 1. The balance of the defendant's notice of motion filed on 26 February 2020 is dismissed. 2. The Court notes: (a) A further document titled Notice of Motion in these proceedings was forwarded by email to the Court and served on the plaintiff's solicitors on 22 April 2020; and (b) That document was not filed, despite orders made by the Court on 12 May 2020, and is not compliant with the Rules. 3. Any further application for orders of the kind reflected in the balance of the defendant's notice of motion filed on 26 February 2020 and/or in the unfiled notice of motion is only to be filed by leave. The question of leave is to be dealt with by the Duty Judge. 4. No order as to costs. Catchwords: No point of principle Cases Cited: ALS 131 Pty Ltd v Rahme [2020] NSWSC 161 ALS 131 Pty Ltd v Rahme [2020] NSWSC 210 ALS 131 Pty Ltd v Rahme [2020] NSWSC 429 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: ALS131 Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Tanya Kristin Rahme (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Keynes (Plaintiff)
Solicitors: Summer Lawyers (Plaintiff) In person (Defendant) File Number(s): 2019/209267
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate