NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McEvoy v Wagglens Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 575 Hearing dates: 23 July 2019 Decision date: 15 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ierace J Decision: (1) Grant leave to extend the time within which the plaintiff may file an appeal from the decision of the magistrate of 4 December 2018, so the plaintiff's application filed on 11 February 2019 is deemed to be filed in time;
(2) Refuse leave to appeal the order made in the Local Court at Hornsby on 4 December 2018 dismissing the plaintiff's notice of motion;
(3) Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – appeal from Local Court to Supreme Court – extension of time to appeal – evidentiary basis for delay in filing summons – fairly arguable case – extension of time granted – summons deemed to be filed in time
APPEALS – appeal from Local Court to Supreme Court – leave to appeal interlocutory judgment – magistrate did not consider all relevant principles and submissions – whether matter should be remitted to Local Court – no injustice going beyond what is merely arguable – leave to appeal refused where order for new trial would be futile Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 7, 36C Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), s 550 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 14, 16 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 40 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4, 14.28, 36.15, 36.16, 50.3 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552; [2000] HCA 41 Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 246; [1981] HCA 20 Empire Shipping v Owners of the Ship "Shin Kobe Maru" (1991) 32 FCR 78; [1991] FCA 641 Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWCA 206 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Jingalong Pty Ltd v Todd [2014] NSWCA 330 New South Wales v Williams (2014) 242 A Crim R 22; [2014] NSWCA 177 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141; [1986] HCA 54 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fentin McEvoy (Plaintiff) Wagglens Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Roderick Cloonen Marr (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiff) S Balafoutis (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate