NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Choy v Rugsat [2020] NSWCATAP 88 Hearing dates: 6 May 2020 Date of orders: 20 May 2020 Decision date: 20 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A P Coleman SC, Senior Member L Wilson, Senior Member Decision: 1. Extension of time to appeal is refused. 2. The Appeal is dismissed. 3. The stay ordered 12 March 2020 is lifted. 4. The amount of $1,760 held by the Tribunal is to be paid to the respondents. Catchwords: APPEAL – Extension of time – no adequate explanation for delay RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES – Ex parte hearing – Denial procedural fairness – No opportunity to be heard Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 36, 38, 41 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2013 (NSW), r 25 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), ss 166, 175, 187 Cases Cited: Jackson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Choy (first appellant) Mary Choy (second appellant) Tanan Rugsat (first respondent) Chananon Rugsat (second respondent) Atunaisa Saqa (third respondent) Representation: Appellants by their agent Mr Kim Respondents by Tanan Rugsat (with Interpreter) File Number(s): AP 20/09578 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 06 November 2019 Before: M Eftimiou, General Member
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate