NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Baker & Provan Defence Pty Limited v Supacat Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 720 Hearing dates: 18 to 22 and 27 May 2020 Decision date: 12 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Ball J Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,409,882.15;
(2) Order that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings;
(3) Liberty to either party to apply to vary order (2) within 14 days of the date of this judgment. Catchwords: CONTRACT – Where contract sets out mechanism to determine apportionment of responsibility for assembly costs overrun – Where party who has to make the determination has to act "reasonably" – Consideration of what acting reasonably involves in the circumstances – Damages – Consideration of principles relating to proof of damages – Where the defendant did not rebut the evidence adduced by the plaintiff. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63; 98 ER 969 Fink v Fink (1946) 74 CLR 127 Ho v Powell (2001) 51 NSWLR 572; [2001] NSWCA 168 Pacific Brands Sport & Leisure Pty Ltd v Underworks Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 288 Paragon Finance Plc v Nash [2002] 1 WLR 685 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850 State of New South Wales v Moss (2000) 54 NSWLR 536; [2000] NSWCA 133 Walton v Illawarra [2011] NSWSC 1188 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Baker & Provan Defence Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Supacat Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Sheldon (Plaintiff) E Glover (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate