NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kelly v Szatow (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 596 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 20 May 2020 Decision date: 20 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of the appeal proceedings on an ordinary basis. Catchwords: COSTS – Indemnity costs – No point of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 119 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 20.26(5), 42.1, 42.2 Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Cat Media Pty Ltd v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2006] NSWSC 790 Kelly v Szatow [2020] NSWSC 407 Mulhern v Pearce (No 2) [2014] FCA 805 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Rogers v Rogers (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 574 Salfinger v Nuigini Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 4) [2007] FCA 1594 Spalla v St George Motor Finance Ltd [2006] FCA 1537 Category: Costs Parties: Peter Kelly (Plaintiff) Cheryl Szatow (First Defendant) Martin Smith (Second Defendant) Donna Greenfield (Third Defendant) Jeff Pettett (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: PE King (Plaintiff) M Hall (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate