NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fobeza Pty Ltd v James Adam Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 597 Hearing dates: 11 May 2020 Date of orders: 20 May 2020 Decision date: 20 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Declarations made that plaintiff validly rescinded contract for sale and is entitled to a refund of the deposit. Catchwords: CONTRACTS — construction — contract for the sale of proposed lot in plan of subdivision — area of lot affected by area of another proposed lot — sketch plan annexed to contract showed area of other lot as 2001m² — correct figure was 2205m² — purchaser given right to rescind if area of other lot shown as 2100m² or more on registered plan — plan of subdivision as registered showed area of other lot to be 2205m² — purchaser rescinded — vendor claimed that sketch plan should be read as if it showed the correct area (2205m²) — vendor claimed that objective intention of parties was to confer a right of rescission if area shown on registered plan exceeded area shown on sketch plan by 5% — whether mistake in contract can be corrected as a matter of construction — whether literal meaning of language of contract created an absurdity — whether objective intention self-evident — held that a reasonable person in the position of the parties would not appreciate the existence of the error — held no absurdity where area recorded on sketch plan not obviously wrong — held that suggested objective intention not self-evident — held that purchaser validly rescinded the contract Cases Cited: Bank of Queensland v Chartis Australia Insurance Ltd [2013] QCA 183 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd (2017) 261 CLR 544; [2017] HCA 12 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420 Mainteck Services Pty Ltd v Stein Huertey SA (2014) 89 NSWLR 633; [2014] NSWCA 184 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 National Australia Bank Ltd v Clowes [2013] NSWCA 179 Seymour Whyte Constructions Pty Ltd v Ostwald Bros Pty Ltd (In liquidation) (2019) 99 NSWLR 317; [2019] NSWCA 11 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fobeza Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) James Adam Pty Ltd (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) William Kevin Young (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D C Price (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Mr M A Ashhurst SC with Mr G Farland (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate