Queensland Legislation
An Act to amend the Gaming Machine Act 1991 , the Keno Act 1996 , the Land Act 1994 , the Major Sports Facilities Act 2001 , the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and the Acts mentioned in schedule 1 for particular purposes The Parliament of Queensland enacts—
Part 1 Preliminary
1 Short title This Act may be cited as the Major Sports Facilities and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2016 .
2 Commencement Parts 2 and 3 commence on a day to be fixed by proclamation.
Part 2 Amendment of Gaming Machine Act 1991
3 Act amended This part amends the Gaming Machine Act 1991 .
4 Amendment of s 312 (Gaming machine tax) Section 312(3) and (4)— omit, insert— (3) The amount of gaming machine tax payable by the licensee in respect of each premises to which the licensee's licence relates is the amount represented by the percentage prescribed, for the category of licensed premises to which the premises belong, of the monthly taxable metered win for the premises for the month for which the tax is payable.
Part 3 Amendment of Keno Act 1996
5 Act amended This part amends the Keno Act 1996 .
6 Insertion of new ss 137A and 137B Part 8, division 1— insert—
137A Keno pooling agreements (1) A keno licensee may enter into an agreement (a keno pooling agreement) with an interstate entity to provide for— (a) the keno licensee and the interstate entity to retain a percentage of amounts received (the pooling contributions) by the keno licensee and the interstate entity from the conduct of jackpot keno games; and (b) how pooling contributions are applied to form part of a prize for a jackpot keno game; and (c) the transfer of pooling contributions between the keno licensee and the interstate entity; and (d) the coordination of the conduct of jackpot keno games by the keno licensee and the interstate entity; and (e) any other matter the chief executive believes is necessary for ensuring— (i) the integrity of the conduct of keno games; or (ii) the public interest is not affected in an adverse and material way. (2) An interstate entity is taken not to conduct a keno game in the State because of 1 or more of the following— (a) the interstate entity is a party to a keno pooling agreement; (b) the interstate entity conducts a jackpot keno game in another State; (c) the interstate entity pays, or is required to pay, to a person a prize for a jackpot keno game. (3) A prize for a jackpot keno game that is conducted in the State must not include an amount received by an interstate entity, other than an amount that is all or part of the pooling contributions. (4) A keno licensee may only pay an amount for a prize for a jackpot keno game conducted in another State if the amount is all or part of the pooling contributions. (5) In this section— interstate entity means an entity that conducts a keno game under a law of another State that provides for the conduct and playing of keno games in that other State. jackpot keno game, in relation to a keno pooling agreement, means a keno game that is the subject of the agreement. keno game includes a game commonly known in another State as keno.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate