Tasmanian Legislation
Architects Act 1929
An Act to provide for the registration of architects and to regulate the practice of architecture [Royal Assent 16 December 1929]
Be it enacted by His Excellency the Governor of Tasmania, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and House of Assembly, in Parliament assembled, as follows:
PART I - Preliminary
1. Short title and commencement (1) This Act may be cited as the Architects Act 1929 . (2) This Act shall come into operation on 1st January 1930.
2. Interpretation In this Act – architect means – (a) a person who is registered as an architect in accordance with Part IV ; and (b) a person who is entitled to hold deemed registration as an architect; architect or architecture does not include naval architect or naval architecture or landscape architect or landscape architecture; Board means the Board of Architects of Tasmania established by this Act; complainant means a person who has made a complaint; complaint means a complaint, made under section 20A , that has not been withdrawn; continuing professional development requirement means a continuing professional development requirement determined by the Board under section 20G ; deemed registration means an entitlement to automatic deemed registration, within the meaning of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 of the Commonwealth; Institute means the Tasmanian Chapter of the Royal Australian Institute of Architects or any other institute which may hereafter be substituted therefor; member means member of the Board; professional misconduct, in relation to a person, means – (a) substantial or persistent unprofessional conduct by the person; or (b) conduct of the person, whether or not occurring in connection with the practice of architecture, that would justify concluding that the person is not a fit and proper person to be an architect; register means the register of architects kept by the Registrar in accordance with Part III ; Registrar means the Registrar appointed under section 7 ; unprofessional conduct, in relation to a person, means conduct by the person, in the course of the practice of architecture by the person, that falls short of the standard of competence and diligence that a member of the public is entitled to expect of a reasonably competent person engaging in the practice of architecture.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate