Western Australian Legislation
Western Australia Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement Act 1981 2 Diamond (Ashton Joint Venture) Security Regulations 1982 Western Australia Diamond (Ashton Joint Venture) Security Regulations 1982 Contents 1. Citation 1 2. Definitions 1 3. Enclosure of designated land 1 4. Enclosure of designated premises 2 5. Controlled access points 3 6. Perimeter signs 4 7. Inspection of boundaries 4 8. Damaging fences, signs, etc. 5 9. Record of agreements 5 10. Safe custody of property 5 11. Searches under section 21 5 12. Searches by agreement 5 13. Property searches 6 14. Detention of persons 6 15. Owners to provide certain facilities 6 16. Obstruction of security officer 7 17. Offences 7 Schedule 1 Security barriers Part I — Security fences 1. 8 2. 8 3. 8 Part II — Security walls Schedule 2 Signs Notes Compilation table 12 Defined terms Western Australia Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement Act 1981 2 Diamond (Ashton Joint Venture) Security Regulations 1982
1. Citation These regulations may be cited as the Diamond (Ashton Joint Venture) Security Regulations 1982 1.
2. Definitions In these regulations — regulation means one of these regulations; Schedule means a Schedule to these regulations; subregulation means a subregulation of the regulation in which the term is used; the Act means the Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement Act 1981 2; waste dump means a waste dump principally consisting of tailings or overburden. [Regulation 2 amended: Gazette 3 Dec 2004 p. 5727.]
3. Enclosure of designated land (1) In this regulation — security fence means a fence the design and construction of which comply with Part I of Schedule 1; security wall means a wall the design and construction of which comply with Part II of Schedule 1. (2) Subject to this regulation the Owners shall erect and maintain around land comprising a designated area — (a) a security fence or security wall; or (b) a fence or wall, or combination of fence and wall, that affords security not less than would be afforded by a security fence or security wall. (3) Where portion of the boundaries of land comprising a designated area consists of — (a) a building or other structure; or (b) a geographical formation, that affords security not less than would be afforded by a security fence or security wall the Owners are not required to comply with subregulation (2) in relation to that portion of the boundaries. (4) Where — (a) a portion of the boundaries of land comprising a designated area is covered by a waste dump; and (b) the entire edge of that part of the waste dump extending beyond the boundaries is greater than 30 m in height, the Owners are not required to comply with subregulation (2) in relation to that portion of the boundaries. (5) Where a portion of the boundaries of land comprising a designated area is submerged by the waters of a lake or dam that was in existence before this subregulation came into operation, the Owners are not required to comply with subregulation (2) in relation to that portion of the boundaries. [Regulation 3 amended: Gazette 3 Dec 2004 p. 5728.]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate