Re Webster, Eric David Ex Parte Pegler, Roy Leslie & Anor [1980] FCA 211
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
IN T
'GENE
=>
JUDGMENT No. sicsssssccotoal ssessnsone
E FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
RAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE No. 330 of 1980
OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND TH!
ro)
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
RE: ERIC DAVID WEBSTER
A A Bankrupt
- EX PARTE: ROY LESLIE PEGLER
RECEIVED —[['"€I _EA J >
10 JUN 1999 Applicant
FEDERAL COURT OF PENINSULA HOLDINGS PTY. LIMITED
Respondent
ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: LOCKHART J.
DATE OF ORDER: MONDAY 22 SEPTEMBER 1980
WHERE MADE: AT SYDNEY
THE
COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.
It be declared that the trusts contained in deed of trust
dated 26 November 1979 (which is Exhibit E in the proceedings
before the Court) be void as against the trustee in the
bankruptcy of the bankrupt;
It be declared that the trusts contained in deed of
settlement dated 26 November 1979 (which is Exhibit D
in the proceedings before this Court) be void as against
the trustee in the bankruptcy of the bankrupt;
It be declared that all shares in the issued capital
of Peninsula Holdings Pty. Limited allotted to the
bankrupt or purporting to be held by him upon the trusts
\
referred to in either of the said deeds be and are hereby
vested in Roy Leslie Pegler as trustee of the bankrupt's estat
The bankrupt, Brian Eric Cairns and Peninsula Holdings Pty.
Limited by itself its servants and agents be restrained
until further order from selling, offering for sale, conveying,
transferring, encumbering, leasing or otherwise dealing with
or disposing of the property known as lot 1414 Pittwater
Road, Narabeen in the State of New South Wales;
The costs of this application including all reserved costs
w
and the costs of all occasions when the application has been
before the Court be the trustee's costs in the bankrupt's
estate and be paid out of the assets of the estate;
Liberty be granted to any party to apply in relation to any
matter that may arise in the implementation of these orders
and generally.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA }
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE )No. 330 of 1980
OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
RE: ERIC DAVID WEBSTER
A Bankrupt
EX PARTE: ROY LESLIE PEGLER
Applicant —
PENINSULA HOLDINGS PTY. LIMITED
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
22. Aint 1980 LOCKHART J.
This is an application for orders declaring that two
settlements of property are void as against Roy Leslie Pegler
("the trustee") as trustee of the estate of Eric David Webster
("the bankrupt"). The application is made pursuant to s. 120
of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 ("the Act"). The trustee also seeks
ancillary relief.
A sequestration order was made against the estate of the
pankrupt on 17 April 1980 upon the petition presented by The
Commercial Banking Company of Sydney Limited on 8 October 1979.
The act of bankruptcy was the failure of the bankrupt to comply
on or before 26 September 1979 with the requirements of
bankruptcy notices served on him on 12 September 1979 and issued
in respect of a District Court judgment for $22,319.61 signed
on 12 March 1976.
..f/2
On 19 December 1979 the bankrupt authorised Barry Norman
Askew to call a meeting of his creditors and to take control
of his property in accordance with the provisions of s. 188
of the Act. Mr. Askew gave evidence that there were no moneys
brought to the credit of the bankrupt's estate during the
period he was the controlling trustee. He said the bankrupt
did not make full and frank disclosure of his affairs and did
not co-operate with him in his endeavours to fulfil his role'
as trustee. Mr. Askew subsequently supported the application"
by the petitioning creditor for a sequestration order against
the estate of the bankrupt.
At the first meeting of creditors held in the bankrupt
estate on 13 June 1980 the creditors resolved to appoint the
trustee as trustee of the bankrupt estate.
On 26 November 1979 the bankrupt caused a company known
as Peninsula Holdings Pty. Limited ("Peninsula Holdings")
to be incorporated of which he was a director and shareholder.
On 4 December 1979 Peninsula Holdings purchased premiseugy
known as No. 1414 Pittwater Road," rabeen, the purchase
price being $235,000.00. The property is subject to a mortgage
in favour of Wardley Australia Limited to secure an advance of
$155,000.00.
On 26 November 1979 the bankrupt executed two deeds. The
first is called a deed of trust in which the bankrupt is
described as "The Trustee" and the beneficiary is described
as "the Trustee for the time being of the Eric Webster Family
Discretionary Trust". I shall refer to this deed as "the
first deed". It recites that there has been allotted or
transferred to the bankrupt the whole of the issued share
Jz
-3-
capital of Peninsula Holdings. It also recites that the
allottments or transfers were made to the bankrupt as a
nominee of the beneficiary.
Under the first deed the bankrupt declares that he holds
the shares and all dividends and interest relating thereto
upon trust for the beneficiary and agrees to deal with them as
the beneficiary may direct (clause 1). The bankrupt agrees to
attend all meetings of shareholders at the request of the
beneficiary and, in effect, to do whatever he may be told to
do by the beneficiary (clause 2). The second recital says:
",,.and it is acknowledged that the Beneficiary
provided the acquisition price thereof."
i.e. the price paid for the acquisition of the said shares.
The second deed is styled "Deed of Settlement" between a
company, D.K.L.R. Holding Co. Pty. Limited, as Settlor and a
company, D.K.L.R. Holding Co. (No. 2) Pty. Limited, as Trustee.
I shall refer to this deed as "the second deed". It recites
that the settlor wishes to make provision for the beneficiaries
(i.e. the bankrupt, his wife, his step son, the wife of his step
son and the children of his step son) and for that purpose has
paid or is about to pay to the trustee the sum of $5.00 which
is described as "the settled sum". The settlor declares
that the trustee shall be entitled to the Trust Fund subject
to the terms of the trust. The "Trust Fund" is defined as
meaning the settled sum together with all moneys and property
paid or transferred to and accepted by the trustee as additions
to the trust fund together with certain other money and
property.
The second deed creates what is generally known as a
discretionary trust. It empowers the trustee to appoint
7/4
any person other than certain excluded persons to be a
beneficiary and to revoke any such appointment prior to
the vesting day; and provides that such power of revocation
shall extend to the persons named as beneficiaries in the
schedule to the deed (Clause 3 (a)). The deed then contains
elaborate provisions for appointment of beneficiaries and
restrictions upon appointment. It is unnecessary to set out
the further terms of the deed which are somewhat lengthy.
The name of the trust constituted by the second deed is
the "Eric Webster Family Discretionary Trust". Thus it is
this trust which is the beneficiary under the first deed.
All persons interested in this application have been
joined as respondents. None have appeared except Mr. Cairns
who was represented on the morning of the hearing by a solicitor
and who submitted to such order as the Court may see fit to make.
It is in these circumstances that this application is brought.
Section 120 of the Act so far as relevant provides:-
"120. (1) A settlement of property, whether made ww
before or after the commencement of this Act,
not being -
(a) a settlement made before and in consideration
of marriage, or made in favour of a purchaser
or encumbrancer in good faith and for valuable
consideration; or
(b) a settlement made on or for the spouse or
children of the settlor of property that
has accrued to the settlor after marriage
in right of the spouse of the settlor,
is, if the settlor becomes a bankrupt and the settlement
came into operation after, or within 2 years before the
commencement of the bankruptcy, void as against the
trustee in the bankruptcy.
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
A payment of money or transfer of property
made by the settlor in pursuance of such
a covenant or contract, whether before or
after the commencement of this Act, is void
as against the trustee in the settlor's
bankruptcy, unless the persons to whom the
payment or transfer was made prove -—
(a) that the payment or transfer was
made more than two years before
the commencement of the bankruptcy;
(b) that at the date of the payment or
transfer the settlor was able to
pay all his debts without the aid
of the money so paid or the property
so transferred; or
(c) that the payment or transfer was made
in pursuance of a covenant or contract
to pay or transfer money or property
expected to come to the settlor from,
or on the death of, a particular person
named in the covenant or contract and
was made within three months after the
money or property came into the
possession or under the control of the
settior.
Where any such payment of money or transfer of
property is void as against the trustee in the
settlor's bankruptcy by virtue of the last
preceding sub-section, the persons to whom the
payment was made or the property was transferred
are entitled to claim for dividend under the
covenant or contract as if it had not been
executed at the commencement of the bankruptcy.
Nothing in this section shall be taken to
affect or prejudice the title or interest
of a person who has, in good faith and for
valuable consideration, purchased or acquired
from the persons entitled to the benefit of
the settlement, covenant or contract or from
the trustee of the settlement the money or
property the subject of the settlement,
covenant or contract or an interest in that
money or property.
In this section, 'settlement of property'
includes any disposition of property."
../7
(2)
(3)
(4)
A settlement of property, whether made before
or after the commencement of this Act, not
being a settlement referred to in paragraph
(a) or (b) of the last preceding sub-section
or a settlement that is void as against the
trustee by reason of the operation of that
sub-section, is, if the settlor becomes a
bankrupt and the settlement came into operation
after or within 5 years before the commencement
of the bankruptcy, void as against the trustee
in the bankruptcy, unless the parties claiming
under the settlement prove -
(a) that the settlor was, at the time of
making the settlement, able to pay all
his debts without the aid of the property ww
comprised in the settlement; and
(b) that the settlor's interest in the property
passed to the trustee of the settlement or
to the donee under the settlement on its
execution,
A covenant or contract made, whether before or
after the commencement of this Act, in consideration
of marriage either -
(a) for the future payment of money to the
settlor's spouse or children; or
(b) for the future settlement of property on or
for the settlor's spouse or children,
being money or property in which the settlor did
not, at the date of the marriage, have any estate ww
or interest, whether vested or contingent, in
possession or remainder, and not being money or
property of, or in right of, the settlor's spouse,
is, if the settlor becomes a bankrupt and the
covenant or contract was executed after the date
of the bankruptcy, void as against the trustee in
the bankruptcy.
The persons entitled under the covenant or contract
may claim for dividend in the settlor's bankruptcy
under the covenant or contract, but such a claim
shall be postponed until all claims of the other
creditors (including claims under section 111
of this Act, claims in respect of excess interest
under section 112 and claims for interest on
interest-bearing debts in respect of a period
after the date of the bankruptcy) have been satisfied.
../6
-7-
I need not refer to the evidence in support of the
application except to say that it establishes all the elements
required by s. 120 (1) and (2).
Accordingly it is an appropriate case for the making
of the declarations sought and ancillary orders.
The order of the Court is as follows:-
1.
Order that it be declared that the trusts contained
in deed of trust dated 26 November 1979 (which is
Exhibit E in the proceedings before the Court)
be void as against the trustee in the bankruptcy
of the bankrupt;
Order that it be declared that the trusts contained
in deed of settlement dated 26 November 1979 (which
is Exhibit D in the proceedings before this Court)
be void as against the trustee in the bankruptcy
of the bankrupt;
Order that it be declared that all shares in the
issued capital of Peninsula Holdings Pty. Limited
allotted to the bankrupt or purporting to be held
by him upon the trusts referred to in either of
the said deeds be and are hereby vested in Roy
Leslie Pegler as trustee of the bankrupt's estate;
Order that the bankrupt, Brian Eric Cairns and
Peninsula Holdings Pty. Limited by itself its
../8
servants and agents be restrained until further
order from selling, offering for sale, conveying,
transferring, encumbering, leasing or otherwise
dealing with or disposing of the property known
as lot 1414 Pittwater Road, Narabeen in the State
of New South Wales;
Order that the costs of this application including
all reserved costs and the costs of all occasions
when the application has been before the Court be
the trustee's costs in the bankrupt's estate and be
paid out of the assets of the estate;
Liberty to any party to apply in relation to any
matter that may arise in the implementation of
these orders and generally.
Wated: 22 Apt KO