In the matter of an Application by the Hospital Employees Federation of Australia [1981] FCA 74
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Mie a ER el ta oe Oe A he
i ee ee
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
)
d.
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) V. No. 4 of 1981
)
)
INDUSTRIAL DIVISION
IN THE MATTER of the CONCILIATION
- AND ARBITRATION acT 1904; "and
IN THE MATTER of an application
under Section 171D of the Act
and IN THE MATTER of an
application by THE HOSPITAL
EMPLOYEES FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHROP J. EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT 25 MAY 1981,
This is an application brought by the Hospital Employees
Federation of Australia pursuant to s.171D of the Conciliation and
Arbitration Act 1904 seeking the reconstitution of a branch of the
federation. The federation is an organization under the Act
and it comprises a number of branches including two branches in
New South Wales at the present time known as the No. 1 branch and
the No. 2 branch, see rule 34 of the federal rules of the
federation. ;
The application is brought under sub-section (1) of
s.171D of the Act seeking firstly a declaration that the New
South Wales No. 2 branch of the federation has ceased to exist
Whe Hee bt ellie rt dal eth a ee fem eS
aE eae a ae CE can AE Oke
or to function effectively and that there are no effective means
under the rules of the federation or the branch by which it can
be reconstituted or enabled to function effectively. Notice of
the application was given to the financial members of the No. 2
branch, being 70 persons, the names and addresses being obtained
from the records of the federal office of the federation and
confirmed by the deduction sheets whereby the employers of those
members deduct the union dues from the wages of those members.
No response was had to that notice of the application seeking
declaration.
On the directions hearing of the application, after:
referring to the fact of the service of the application on the
members of No. 2 branch, orders were made that the matter be set
down for hearing at a time to be fixed by the Registrar. Notice
of the date of the hearing of the application likewise was served
on each of the members of the No. 2 branch, There has been no
communication from any of those members except one who says that
she is no longer a member but, of more importance, no person has
objected to the form of the scheme set out in the application.
In view of the notices given to members of the No. 2 branch it
is not necessary to make any further order or direction or direct
notice to be given by way of advertisement or otherwise pursuant
to s.171D (6) .of the Act.
The evidence in support of the making of the
declaration appears from the affidavit of Leslie George Butler,
sworn on 2 April 1981 and filed herein, together with oral
ERM rR EE OR ERE Ne RE ka aE nde taal Ae la ee atte
Bee
Roa
Re et a nee EO
oh
evidence given today. I do not propose to repeat the substance
of that material except to say that I am satisfied as to the
truth of the facts sworn to and they establish the fact that
the No. 2 branch 1s not functioning at all at the moment and
also has ceased to function effectively.
Under s.171D(1) of the Act an organization, in this
case the federation, may apply to the court for a declaration
that a part of the organization, including a branch, has
ceased to exist or to function effectively and there are no
effective means under the rules of the organization or \
branch by which it can be reconstituted or enabled to function
effectively and, in those circumstances, the court has
jurisdiction to hear and determine the application and to
make a declaration accordingly.
The material before the court shows that attempts
have been made to have the branch function effectively and those
attempts have extended over some years. The number of financial
members is small and having regard to the basic requirements of
branches at the current time a membership of 70 1s hardly
sufficient to support the view that a branch with that membership
could function effectively. There are no office bearers and no
elections have taken place for many years and on the material
before the court I am satisfied of the conditions prescribed by
Flew OSB WSEDAeaa TEN ata tee Came Ee ete outcte lee Law sentence mae anki teehee tee aE
SET eM tT
Pa
o
sub-section (1) of s.171D. Accordingly the court makes the
declaration in the form sought as follows:
",., that the New South Wales No, 2 Branch of The
Hospital Employees Federation of Australia
has ceased to exist or to function effectively
and that there are no effective means under
the Rules-of the Federation or the said Branch
by which it can be reconstituted or enabled to
function effectively."
In the circumstances of this case there is no need to
make the further or alternative declaration sought in the
application itself.
The question then arises as to what order should be
made under sub-section (2) of s.171D. That section reads, and
I quote from it -
"Where the Court makes a declaration under
sub-section (1) the Court may, by order,
approve a scheme for the taking of action
by ... an officer ... of the organization
-.- to enable it to function effectively ..."
The "it" in the present case refers to the branch which has ceased
to function effectively.
What is being sought by the present scheme 1s to create
what might be described as an amalgamation of the No, 1 and No, 2
branches in New South Wales. The current federal rule 34 provides
as follows:
weeks nee
el She i ke Mr Sei a Tne Kin athe? SO bdentlnn BT n hahaa Aaah AD aibNerbintin aetna since uae eee
mek ie ete be alee ae nine
neem e Qeeat rect eae ey me ee
"(qa) There shall be a line of demarcation of
members as follows: Group A - ,.."
There are then set out a number of persons eligible for membership
but these exclude certain employees employed in certain areas.
Group B refers to the employees who are excluded in
Group A, and Group C includes all professional officers and nurses,
Sub-rule (d) provides -
"In the State of New South Wales there shall be
two Branches. No. 1 Branch shall comprise all
the members of Group A. No. 2 Branch shall
comprise all the members of Group C." '
What 1s sought in the scheme is to create or to form one branch
only in New South Wales as follows -
"In the State of New South Wales there shall be
one Branch comprising all the members in Groups
A and Cc."
At the present time there are some 1,100 members in branch No, 1
and some 69 members in branch No. 2,
By the rules of the federation the national council is
constituted under rule 12 and under rule 13 has the management
and control of the affairs of the federation and one of the
particular powers conferred upon it 1s a power to repeal, alter
and add to the rules or any of them. Rule 31 prescribes the
procedure to be followed to enable the national council to
«Gee
See ree ny ae eee
ce reece ternt en fe wate Ae Meant At a leh ct nthe Ac mvt Natalee ie te eater ale nd Abia ILE DRA WRI SAnbin he mS eve fam aa
exercise its power of altering rules, and I read out sub-rule (1)
"Subject to Rules 35(a) and 36 of these Rules
no new rules shall be made, nor shall any of
the Rules of the Federation be altered, amended
or rescinded, except by and at a meeting of
the National Council. Notice of any proposed
new rule, alteration or rescission shall be
sent to all Branch Secretaries at least six
weeks prior to the meeting of the National
Council at which the matter is to be discussed.
Branches shall be bound to inform members at the
next General Meeting of the proposed addition,
alterations or rescission of Rules and members
shall be entitled to instruct their delegate to
National Council as to how they shall vote on
the submitted proposals ..."
Provision is then made for the calling of special meetings 1£ '
no general meeting 1s to be held within the period of six weeks
prior to the next meeting of national council to determine the
question.
The scheme which 1s proposed is directed to authorizing
an alteration to rule 34 in the form already indicated by
substituting a new sub-rule (d), but because of rule 31 the
proposed alteration cannot be dealt with effectively since the
No. 2 branch of New South Wales has ceased to exist or to function
effectively. To overcome this difficulty the scheme proposed
1s as follows - —
"(a) Within 28 days of the date of the Order of
: this Court, the National Secretary of the
Federation shall give notice to the Secretary
of each Branch of the Federation (other than
the New South Wales No. 2 Branch) and to each
member of the New South Wales No. 2 Branch
that at 1ts next meeting to be held 1n October
1981, the National Council shall consider a
resolution that Federal Rule 34(d) be altered
so as to read -
endes
Re et Ca Eee Since wilt ihe tie teat rtitinete ae schntnh cliente ie? leg oa at
" '(d) In the State of New South Wales there
shall be one Branch comprising all the
members in Groups A and C,'
(b) Within the 6 weeks preceding the meeting of the
National Council at which the said resolution is
to be considered, each Branch (other than the
New South Wales No. 2 Branch) shall hold a
general meeting of members at which the Secretary
of the Branch shall inform the members present
of the proposed alteration to the Rules and at
which the members present shall be entitled to
instruct the delegate or delegates of that Branch
to the National Council as to how such delegate
or delegates shall vote on the proposal.
.(c) In the event that the said resolution 1s carried
at the meeting of the National Council, the
National Secretary shall forthwith apply to the
Industrial Registrar for certification of the
altered Rule,
(ad) Upon certification of the altered Rule -
(i) the members of the New South Wales
No. 1 Branch and the New South Wales ,
No, 2 Branch shall become the members
of the New South Wales branch,
(ii) the funds and property of the New
South Wales No. 1 Branch and the New
South Wales No. 2 Branch shall become
the funds and property of the New
South Wales Branch,
(izi) the Officers, the members of the
Committee of Management, the Delegates
to National Council and all other
delegates, representatives and employees
of the New South Wales No, 1 Branch
shall be the Officers, the members of
the Committee of Management, the
delegates to National Council and other
delegates, representatives and employees
of the New South Wales Branch, and,
(iv) the Officers of the Federation and
- the Branches of the Federation shall
take all steps necessary to give effect
to the Order of this Court."
The scheme as provided for in that notice, is a scheme
within sub-section (2) of s.,171D and is directed to making
effective not so much the No, 2 branch but to ancorporate the
1-8.
fl we Bebeeapte eed oe OLE EN ae tree SUNS te Ul mah Leanne Mntastimwentile et hbdialaen ENitbaaeeal hme Mme he ne ee A nteentenr ot lnm me manana Name MB ate
members who would otherwise not be eligible to be members of the
No. 1 branch to become members of the No. 1 branch thereby to
become members of an effective body of the federation once
more and thus effective in the affairs of the organization.
My only cencern is whether sub-section (3) of s.,171D
requires further action to be taken or action of a different
kind. That sub-section reads -
"Before making an order under this section the
Court shall satisfy itself that the order would
not do substantial injustice to the organization
or to any member of the organization,"
Two matters call for consideration. Firstly, the
court was informed that at the present time an election 1s taking
place for the office bearers and delegates in the No. 1 branch
and the new officers will take office in September of this year
and under the rules will hold office for four years. This means
that if the rule is altered in accordance with the orders sought
the 69 members of the No. 2 branch are not able to exercise their
right of voting in the current election and will not have a
similar right except by way of possibly filling casual vacancies
until the next general elections in four years' time.
Having regard to the fact that each of those members
has had knowledge of the form of scheme proposed and no one has
raised objection to it, having regard also to the fact that the
No. 2 branch is not functioning and cannot function effectively
and having regard also to the numbers of members involved in the
two branches, the court is satisfied that no substantial anjustice
is caused to any of the members or persons who were members of
the No. 2 branch by reason of not having the right to vote at the
current elections.
The second matter relates to the funds and property
of the No. 2 branch which at the moment comprises some $7000.
This is held in a bank account, the payments in being the
deductions made by the employers of the members by way of dues
to the federation, the payments out being authorized by the
federal secretary and the two national trustees. At the present
time the individual members of the former No. 2 branch have no
control over those funds and they will become part of the funds
of the new branch to be created and indirectly the 69 members
will gain the benefit from that transfer of funds and the power
of the branch to deal effectively with that property. Likewise,
the court is satisfied that the transfer of those funds will not
do substantial injustice to any member of the organization.
Accordingly, the court proposes to make the order
sought and to approve the scheme proposed by the organization,
The court makes the declaration in the form already indicated
and appearing in paragraph 1 of the application and the court
makes an order approving the scheme as appearing in paragraph 3
' G Se TS SESE ORR RAE WO IRIE ET ST REI RE ATEN,
of the application. a
i o,
- I certify that this and the E.qHT C85
preceding pages are a true copy of thd
{ Reasons for Jutgment herein of the
| Honourable Mr. fustica NORTHROP |
. vel yt on
Wee gy hrcore
Assoeiaic
'\
iF
J
Dated: ZO MAY 19S)
Fearne ereer stat UN ETI
ee ee TT A el ES,