Deputy Commissioner of Taxation Clyne, Peter Leopold & Ors [1983] FCA 407
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
)
GENERAL DIVISTON ) No. P4 of 1983
)
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF TIM STATE ) No. G287 of 1983
)
OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE ) No. G319 of 1983
)
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
BETWEEN: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OF TAXATION
AND: PETER LEOPOLD CLYN#
AND: THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN
BANKRUPTCY
AND: WILLLAM EDWARD ANDREW
No. W838 of 1983
Re- PETER LBOPOT.D CLYNE
Ex parte: WILLIAM EDWARD ANDREW
ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER Neaves J.
DATE OF ORDER: 23 December 1983
WHERE MADE: Canberra
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.
in
The application by the trustee of the estate
£
OL
to
of
the bankrupt for leave to make an allowance
the bankrupt pursuant to paragraph 135(1)(j)
the Bankruptcy Act 1966 be refused.
The trustee's costs of the application be paid
out of the estate of the bankrupL.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
)
GENERAL DIVISION ) No. P4 of 1983
)
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF TIE STATE ) No. G287 of 1983
No. G319 of 1983
OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE
)
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
BETWEEN: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
or OF TAXATION
AND. PETER LEOPOLD CLYNE
AND: THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN
~— BANKRUPTCY
AND: WILLIAM EDWARD ANDREW
No. W838 of 1983
Re. PETER LEOPOLD CLYNE
Ex parte: WILLIAM EDWARD ANDREW
CORAM: Neaves J.
DATE. 23 December 1983
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This 1s an application by William Edward Andrew
("the applicant"), the trustee of the estate of Pcter
Leopold Clyne (''the bankrupt"), for an order that the
applicant be at liberty to make an allowance to the bankrupt
pursuant to paragraph 135(1)(j) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966
to enable payment of certain medical and incidental expenses.
As filed the application sought the leave of
the Court in respect of amounts totalling $7,581.86.
That amount was subsequently reduced to $3,488.21 itemised
as follows -
Dr. J.F. Martin 175.00
Dr. K.R. Thompson & Associates 359.00
Epworth Hospital 2,122.41
Dr. Michael Luxton 561.80
Melbourne Diagnostic Group 235.00
Dr. Brian Bunton 35.00
$3,488.21
ft may be noted that the amounts making up the balance of
the $7,581.86 include amounts for air fares and hotel
expenses.
The applicant relies upon his affidavit sworn
24 November 1983. He states that he has been informed by
the bankrupt and verily believes that he, the bankrupt,
has incurred various medical and incidental expenses as a
result of an illness which commenced on 21 October 1983
and that the bankrupt has received restricted income since
the date of his illness and is unable to attend to payment
of the various accounts. The trustee further states that,
as a result of enquiries he has made, he has been informed
that the bankrupt is not entitled to Commonwealth assistance
in relation to his medical expenses as he is an uninsured
person.
Annexed to the affidavit are copies of letters
received by the trustee from the bankrupt. 'The letters are
dated 3 November 1983 (2 letters), 8 November 1983,
15 November 1983 and 17 November 1983,
The following 1s an extract from one of the
letters dated 3 November 1983 -
"IT am unlikely to have much income in the
next few months. Meanwhile, my medical expenses
in Melbourne...two specialists, one week in in-
tensive care, and the angiogram...are likely to
be $6000-7000; and the expenses of open-hearted
surgery and the lengthy convalescence after that
will be very substantial too.
"Could some way be found of using the
$30,000 about to be paid to you by Sharsie Pty.
Ltd. to pay these and other current expenses?
"You will recall that under its agreement
of 1/7/83 Sharsie Pty. Ltd. 1s bound to pay my
personal expenses, and of course it is willing
to do so. On the other hand, its cepayment of $30,000
ahead of time is quite voluntary, and of course the
company would very much prefer to make this payment
on terms that it is used wholly or partly to pay
my expenses.
"My suggestion is that the payment should be
treated as a prepayment of interest under the
agreement of 1/7/83. This would make it income,
and the consequences would be that under the orders
made by Beaumont J. one quarter would go to you
and three quarters would be available to me.
My 75% could then be used to pay current and
future medical expenses, perhaps also other
expenses."
The letter dated 8 November 1983 reads -
"I refer to my previous note concerning the use
of Sharsie Pty. Ltd.'s funds for the payment of
medica] and other expenses.
"I understand this was discussed at the Creditors'
meeting and you have taken it under advisement
but 1t occurs to me that there would be an
easier way of doing it rather than the one
previously suggested .-
"Under its agreement of Ist July 1983 - which,
so far as T know remains legally binding on
both parties - Sharsie Pty. Ltd. is required
to pay all my personal and business expenses.
You will find a copy of this agreement in the
annexure to the supplemental Statement of
Affairs. Sharsie Pty. Ltd. cannot pay money
to anyone but yourself but it is under no
obligation to pay any money to you either at
this point of time.
"The arrangement that occurs to me, especially
if no-one objects to it, is that in terms of
the agreement Sharsie should pay such personal
and business expenses as you approve of. From
time to time Sharsie would present you with a
number of accounts and, subject to your
approval, you would pay these accounts after
drawing the necessary funds from the Sharsie
account.
"rf these moneys were passed through my personal
Bank Account and then paid out, you would be
entitled to 25% of what was paid in and, of
course, some arrangement would need to be made
co ensure that you do, in facl, receive this
25%. In other words, if bills totalling
$7,500-00 are awaiting payment Sharsie would
pay $10,000 to you and you would pay the bills
and retain the other $2,500, in accordance
with the orders made by Beaumont J.
"This is simply an alternative suggestion and
you might let me know, in due course, what you and
your advisers feel about it. The best course,
although I'm not sure about this, would be to
submit the proposed arrangements to the
Commonwealth Crown Solicitor and ask beforehand
whether there is likely tou be any objection."
The Following 18 an extract from the letter
dated 15 November 1983 -
"Owing to my recent illness, I have had
no income for some weeks, and a number of accounts
are awaiting payment. Your assistance 1s requested
in this regard.
"As suggested in recent correspondence,
if 1t is possible, I would like you to pay
these accounts from the funds presently
available from Sharsie Pty. Ltd., by re-
questing Wantrup & Assoc. to forward you
the total amount of $7,321.46 from Sharsie's
funds with the State Bank of Victoria, and
then (subject to your being satisfied that
the payments are genuine and reasonable)
you would pay them yourself.
"It is submitted that this procedure
would be consistent both with the agreement
of 1/7/83 between Sharsie Pty. Ltd. and
myself, and with the various court orders
which entitle the State Bank of Victoria
to pay moneys to you, and to no one else."
Then followed details of accounts totalling $7,321.46.
Of that amount $3,227.81 represented accounts in relation
to which the present application is madc.
The letter dated 17 November 1983 contained the
following paragraph -
"I refer to my letter of the 15th November,
and our conversation of today's date when you
indicated that you intend to apply to the Court
under Sec. 135(1)(j) for leave to appropriate
the funds which Sharsie Pty. Ltd. intends to
pay to you to the payment of such accounts as
you consider to be 'just'."
Thereafter followed details of the bankrupt's recent medical
history.
The truth of the matlers set out in the above
letters has not been established in evidence before me.
This is of some importance in so far as the letters purport
to set out the bankrupt's financial position.
There has also been tendered in evidence before
me a letter dated 12 December 1983 addressad by the bankrupt
to the trustee. It reads -
"I refer to your application under
Sec. 135(1)(j) which is before the Court
today.
"As indicated in a separate letter of
today's date, I have just received a retainer
of $2500, and 25% of this has been paid to
you in accordance with the orders made by
Beaumont J.
"There is quite a good chance of further
income becoming available in the next few
weeks...
"Tt seems to me that application under
Sec. 135(1)(j) should only be made as a last
resort, and with a Jittle give-and-take from
those concerned I think I can pay the non-
medical bills submitted to you From my income.
"Therefore IT would like to suggest that
you limit your application to the medical
bills ...™
Paragraph 135(1)(j) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966
provides -
"(1) The trustee may, with the permission of the
ereditors granted by resolution passed at a
general meeting or of the committee of inspection
or with the leave of the Court, do all or any of
the following things:
(j) make such allowance out of the estate as
he thinks just to the bankrupt, the spouse
of the bankrupt or the family of the
bankrupt; and
te
Any allowance which 1s to be paid following
the approval of the creditors or the Leave of the Court
under that paragraph is to be paid out of the bankrupt
estate. There 1s more than a suggestion in the letters
to which I have referred that the allowance is to be
paid out of moneys to be made available to the trustee
by a company known as Sharsie Pty. Ltd., a company which
the bankrupt says was incorporated on 2 March 1983 at the
bankrupt's request and for his benefit. It is, however,
asserted that that company is under no obligation to pay
any moneys to the trustee. Unless those moneys when paid
form part of the bankrupt estate paragraph 135(1)(4) of
the Act would provide no warrant for the trustee dispersing
those moneys in payment of the expenses incurred by the
bankrupt. There is no material before me as to the amounts
which have been brought to the credit of that estate.
The bankrupt has not yet been publicly examined as to
his property, trade dealings and affairs.
The trustee, while requesting that the leave of
the Court be given to the payment of the proposed allowance,
has not put forward any reasons why that course should be
followed. The Deputy Conmissioner of Taxation, who is
said to be the only creditor of the estate, opposes the
making of the order.
In a document prepared by the bankrupt and
described as a supplement to his statement of affairs
statements are made that the bankrupt propases to
continue to practise as a tax consultant and to write
books about tax avoidance, a book being with the publishers
(page 7), that he has paid his debts punctually (except
those due for income tax) and that he has continued to
pay his debts netwithstanding certain orders made by the
Court on 17 August 1983 by using international cheques
available to the bankrupt on his personal current account
with Creditanstalt Bankverein, Vienna (page 24).
The material placed before me falls short of
satisfying me that leave should be granted to the trustee
to make an allowance to the bankrupt to enable payment of
the medical and incidental expenses the subject of the
application. Leave is accordingly refused.
I certify that this and the preceding
seven (7) pages are a true copy of the
Reasons for Judgment herein of the
Honourable Mr. Justice Neaves.
DATE: 23 December 1983
| O° Os
Associate