Telmak Teleproducts Australia Pty Ltd & Ors v. Bond International Pty Ltd & Ors [1985] FCA 318

» i? Cn on Cte MON, ; - CATCHVIORDS ' ~o, i ' ' on . , .

TRADE PPACTICES - Exhibition of talev21 tembination ct vroducts sinliar te the arolicant - Pessibility of 71avwers 241 cffer was maadé on Dehalf of applicanc

question co be triad as to misleadins

respondent.

Farkdale Custom Buiic Turriture Pty Linited v7 Puxu Po. Eamited (13982) 149 C.L.R. 131 applisd.

SOFYRISHT - Test to be adopred in relatisn co surficiency of case to sueecrc grant of inte:rlocutery say aaccian - What @2saliigs consultute infringement of ctreyright 11 fila - Tafscingement of copyrighce an film scrisc ALL

script - What coms tarutes reproduction o iz Australian Taar52 Grain Pool Pty Liawiced

Ecard of Suestsiand 113282) 16 A.L.B. a.

Fey Limited v Peanut asketing Boarca wilt,

Hayden (1921) 55 A.L.R. 72. Exitoma Pty mie

"eak Industry Emplores = Jnien (192+ f1 ALL.R 720, Agpl> Computer Inc v Computec Edge Pey Srmrt2a (it94) 55 Alo.F. IDS. Ladbeske 'Football! Limited v wWilitae Gill + Fesctkeali =

£1354] 1 W.L 272 apolied. Applecir Faciss

racer Pty bx 2d 323) 50 ALLA. 420, Dee oi

eltv Studics c ¢ 46 2.0.R. 13

Ask e £135 . 723 refers

Act 1lasd

Wilcox J. LD Tuly 13385 Sydney

vp ee u a oi at [>| nm J my A o . rm oF irl Cul 4° ub Et w Uk 4 0 ar Oh 7 =) te tho ua vd C37) wot Ls) -- ttl rr ' td tt, tr 44 tin tte Patel an i ot Rta rg okt alts i ee fo i nf wn Cole | ee | nm 4 + Wns ' 1 oh ! rey Ld fol bid 41 Ht a 5 fiers bi wm ott {1 an [jie . in {c] 1 cy vate Ftd . set 1] Fi ia) qr] Q fen [an | yl 4 wit Ls SIE Tae 3 ay] ert d djs al? roles EAs CHE OH ebay Oy € arty) (ra) Fae] ralin acl 4 Oy fu ey 2 a, ria ei I m wi ay isK Ma bi 1] a 53 a is cD ty Lae i HI rt el an f4 2 be fl me +t 7 > H Ly we ry a ** [a 2, ss Ec fry af hyp 5 mm) FL ey id oO; amy 4 a conor a

Py

a eA Ltr lene — ie Sete

el

U3) bay

uw

roa

ch