Matson, Re R.G. Ex Parte Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1986] FCA 17
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
CATCHWOARDS
BANKRUPTCY - objection to discharge - order fixing time of lapse
of objection ~ whether granted ex parte - order of interim kind.
Bankruptcy Act 1966, ss.149(3)(c), 149(8), 149(12)
Bankruptcy Amendment Act 1980, s.72(2)
Re: Ronald Gregory Matson~
Ex Parte: The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy F)
- Co col Tes
NSW E780 of 1977
PINCUS J.
BRISBANE
23 January 1986
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
GENERAL DIVISTON ) NSW E780 of 1977
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE SOUTHERN )
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND )
RE: RONALD GREGORY MATSON
EX PARTE: THE OFFICIAL TRUSTER IN BANKRUPTCY
MINUTES OF ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: PINCUS J.
DATE OF ORDER: 23 JANUARY 1986
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The period at the expiration of which an objection
dated 30 May, 1980 entered by Daniel Joseph Noel
Bluett under paragraph (3)(c) of s.149 of the
Bankruptcy Act 1966 will lapse, be extended until
31 March, 1986.
N
.
The applicant have leave to amend his application
so as to include an application under s.149(12) of
the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
3. Material in support of the application be filed and
served on or before 12 February, 1986.
4. The matter be mentioned again at 2.15 p.m. on 14
February, 1986.
Zz
oO
TE: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36
of the Federal Court Rules.
IN_THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
GENERAL DIVISION ) NSW E780 of 1977
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE SOUTHERN )
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND )
RE: RONALD GREGORY MATSON
EX PARTE: THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY
PINCUS Jd. 23 JANUARY 1986
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for an order that the period at
the expiration of which an objection entered under par.3(c) of
s.149 of the Act will lapse be extended for such further period
as the court may determine. The bankrupt attained that status on
the 21 November 1977.
The material before me includes an objection to his
discharge which was made on the 30 May 1980 under s.149 of the
Bankruptcy Act. That provision was repealed and replaced by the
present s.149 by Act No. 12 of 1980, which has a transitional
provision, mamely $.72(2). The effect of the transitional
provision is that the present s.149(8) is to be read as if the
reference in it to the date of bankruptcy were read as a
reference to the date of commencement of that section, that is
s.72(2) of Act No. 12 of 1980. That date of commencement was 1
February 1981. Mr. Dutney of counsel for the applicant contends,
and it seems to me to be correct, that the effect of the
transitional provision with respect to the present case is that,
absent any order under section 149, a discharge will occur under
s.149(8) on the 1 February 1986.
The present application is brought ex parte, one reason
for that being, as is said, that there was thought to be some
apprehension about steps which the bankrupt might take if he were
served with the papers. The information upon which the
application is based is, in essence, that an officer of the
Queensland police force, called to investigate a robbery at the
premises of the bankrupt, found there goods of considerable
value. The information was notified to the trustee on 3 December
1985, and it seems clear from what Mr. Dutney has candidly told
me that the delay since then has been partly due to an
uncertainty as to how to proceed.
I am somewhat troubled by the notion of making an order
under 5.149(8) in the absence of the bankrupt. Ex parte orders
which substantially affect people's rights should only be made,
in my view, in circumstances of an extreme kind. Mr. Dutney
argues in effect that such circumstances exist here, and has
referred me to the affidavit of Ms. Scheelbeck, on which the
application is based, and also to the report of the Official
Receiver made on the 17 September 1980.
With some hesitation, I have come to the view that I
should accept Mr. Dutney's submission, and I propose to make an
order under s.149(8) to enable the applicant to apply under
s.149(12); that is, I propose to order that the period at the
expiration of which the objection which I have mentioned will
lapse be a period expiring on 31 March 1986. The applicant in
the meantime must file his material to ground the substantive
application, that 1s the application under s.149(12).
I will order that the application be amended so as to
include an application for an order under s.149(12), and that the
application as amended, together with any material in support of
it be filed and served on or before Wednesday, 12 February 1986.
I will order that the matter be mentioned further at
2.15 p.m. on Friday, 14 February 1986.
Scertify that this and the od preceding
Pages are a true copy of whe reasors for
judament herein of His Honour
Mr Justice Pincus Mosca oO Rion
Ry /2 / sg Associate
Dated