Kilpatrick, Re D.J.W. Bankrupt, Ex Parte The [1986] FCA 53
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
" 82
iN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISTON
BANKREESTCY
DresRic? OF THE STA
ig
"i
= STATE OF
VICTORIA
CORAM.
VTE
pee ar
RE: DIANE SOCELYN AK
KILPATP ION
Apgelicant
EX PARTE: THE BANKRUPT
Pespondent
JACKSON 7.
& February 1986
MELEOURNE
MINUTES OF ORDEP
orders that:
she bankrupt Es dischargec frcm bankeuptc7.
Settlement anc entry of orders 15 dealt vith
Bankruptcy Pule 124.
af
Gensteae OmstTRIB
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
GENERAL DIVISION )
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF )
VICTORIA ) No. 686 of 1984
RE: DIANE JOCELYN WHYTE
KILPATRICK
Applicant
EX PARTE: THE BANKRUPT
Respondent
CORAM ; JACKSON J.
DATE: 5 February 1986
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 10th September, 1984, the applicant was made
bankrupt on her own application. She now applies fcr an order
of discharge under s.150(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
At the time when she became bankrupt, the bankrupt's
unsecuced creditors amounted in total to $24,433.00. The
Official Receiver has stated in his report that in his opinion
the causes of the bankruptcy were the failure of Marvel
Marketing Pty Ltd, a company with which she was concerned,
and the personal guarantees given by the bankrupt for some of
the debts of that company.
Marvel Marketing Pty Ltd was a company which was
incorporated to act as trustee of the Kilpatrick Family Trust,
*he bankrupt and her former husband being the sole directors
of the company at all times after 30th March 1979.
Although the bankrupt performed secretarial services
For the company, her husband was General Manager and salesman
and the company appears to have been conducted in practical
terms by her husband.
The bankrupt's dealings with the company came to an
end in May, 1981 after she separated from her husband. In
consequence of an agreement entered into with him under s.37
of the Family Law Act, she had been given an indemnity in
respect cr all the company debts which she had personally
guaranteed. She expected her former husband to meet the
company debts for which she was personally liable and when he
became a bankrupt, she saw no alternative but to present her
own vetition.
Applications under s.150(1) depend very much on their
own facts. In the present case I am satisfied that none of
the matters referred to 1n s.150(6) of the Act 15 established
and that there 1s no purpose which might usefuliy be served by
declining to make an order.
Accordingly, I make an order of discharge in respect
of the bankrupt.
I certify that this and the ol
preceding pages are a true copy of
the Reasons for Judgment herein of
his Honour Mr Justice Jackson.
Associate: WW L2
Date: £7 2 eb